Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39622636›Full record

ArticleGenome research2025

The rate and spectrum of new mutations in mice inferred by long-read sequencing.

Eugenio López-Cortegano, Jobran Chebib, Anika Jonas, Anastasia Vock, Sven Künzel, Peter D Keightley, Diethard Tautz

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genome research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Convergence and Parallelism of Phenotypic and Molecular Genetic Variability in Some Species.Doklady biological sciences : proceedings of the Academy of Sciences of the USSR, Biological sciences sections · 2026
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Increased rate ofbioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Eugenio López-CorteganoInstitute of Ecology and Evolution, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh EH9 3FL, United Kingdom; elcortegano@protonmail.com.ORCID 0000-0001-6914-6305
Jobran ChebibInstitute of Ecology and Evolution, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh EH9 3FL, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0003-0573-6837
Anika JonasDepartment for Evolutionary Genetics, Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Biology, 24306 Plön, Germany.
Anastasia VockDepartment for Evolutionary Genetics, Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Biology, 24306 Plön, Germany.
Sven KünzelDepartment for Evolutionary Genetics, Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Biology, 24306 Plön, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-4992-5963
Peter D KeightleyInstitute of Ecology and Evolution, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh EH9 3FL, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0001-8129-2794
Diethard TautzDepartment for Evolutionary Genetics, Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Biology, 24306 Plön, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-0460-5344

Funding

European Research Council 694212
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

All forms of genetic variation originate from new mutations, making it crucial to understand their rates and mechanisms. Here, we use long-read sequencing from Pacific Biosciences (PacBio) to investigate de novo mutations that accumulated in 12 inbred mouse lines derived from three commonly used inbred strains (C3H, C57BL/6, and FVB) maintained for 8 to 15 generations in a mutation accumulation (MA) experiment. We built chromosome-level genome assemblies based on the MA line founders' genomes and then employed a combination of read and assembly-based methods to call the complete spectrum of new mutations. On average, there are about 45 mutations per haploid genome per generation, about half of which (54%) are insertions and deletions shorter than 50 bp (indels). The remainder are single-nucleotide mutations (SNMs; 44%) and large structural mutations (SMs; 2%). We found that the degree of DNA repetitiveness is positively correlated with SNM and indel rates and that a substantial fraction of SMs can be explained by homology-dependent mechanisms associated with repeat sequences. Most (90%) indels can be attributed to microsatellite contractions and expansions, and there is a marked bias toward 4 bp indels. Among the different types of SMs, tandem repeat mutations have the highest mutation rate, followed by insertions of transposable elements (TEs). We uncover a rich landscape of active TEs, notable differences in their spectrum among MA lines and strains, and a high rate of gene retroposition. Our study offers novel insights into mammalian genome evolution and highlights the importance of repetitive elements in shaping genomic diversity.

Indexed as

MutationMutation RateAnimalsGenomeINDEL MutationMiceMicrosatellite RepeatsRepetitive Sequences, Nucleic AcidSequence Analysis, DNA

Identifiers

PMID39622636
PMCPMC11789640

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.