Observational studyOpen heart2024
Effect of optimisation to contemporary HFrEF medical therapy with sacubitril/valsartan (Entresto) and dapaglifloziN on left Ventricular reverse remodelling as demonstrated by cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) Imaging: the ENVI study.
Observational study in Open heart, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05348226 (Effect of Sacubitril/Valsartan), which is not on this map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Effect of Sacubitril/Valsartan (ENtresto) on Left Ventricular Reverse Remodelling as Demonstrated by Cardiac Magnetic Resonance (CMR) Imaging
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Impacts of Sacubitril-Valsartan versus Valsartan on Left Ventricular Remodeling and Cardiac Function in Patients with Ischemic Heart Failure and Reduced Ejection Fraction: A Randomized Double-blinded Controlled Trial.Cardiovascular & hematological disorders drug targets · 2026Trial
- Authentic content as an effective mechanism for embedding patient voices in health innovation: a hypothesis and conceptual framework.Frontiers in health services · 2026Article
- Clinical Effectiveness of Sacubitril/Valsartan in Heart Failure Patients With Coexisting Chronic Kidney Disease.Cureus · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
17 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionHeart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) guidelines recommend 'four pillars' of medical therapy and device therapy if left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) remains ≤35% after 3 months optimum medical therapy.We conducted the first study to examine the effects of optimisation to contemporary medical therapy on cardiac reverse remodelling, as demonstrated by cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (CMR).We hypothesised a proportion of patients would undergo beneficial remodelling and LVEF improvement above the threshold for complex device prescription after 6 months.
methodsHFrEF patients with symptomatic LVEF≤35% despite ACE inhibitor/beta blocker/mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist therapy, and qualified for sacubitril/valsartan switchover were recruited to this single centre prospective study.CMR was performed at baseline and at follow-up. Clinical, volumetric and outcome data were collected and compared.
resultsBetween June 2021 and August 2022, 49 patients were recruited. The majority (80%) were male, mean age 63±14 years. 35 (71%) had non-ischaemic cardiomyopathy. 2 (4%) patients died and 47 were followed up for a median of 7.4 months. There were no heart failure hospitalisations.Significant reductions were seen in median indexed left atrial volume: 54 mL/m
conclusionsOptimisation to contemporary HFrEF medical therapy results in beneficial cardiac reverse remodelling and significant improvements in LVEF and NTproBNP at 6 months as demonstrated by CMR. 59% of our cohort no longer met complex device indications. Guidelines suggest re-assessment of LVEF at 3 months, but our data suggests a longer period is required. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT05348226.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.