Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39622573›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2024

Cross-sectional study evaluating the effectiveness of the Mozambique-Canada maternal health project abstraction tool for maternal near miss identification in Inhambane province, Mozambique.

Maud Muosieyiri, Jessie Forsyth, Fernanda Andre, Ana Paula Ferrão da Silva Adoni, Nazeem Muhajarine

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Maud MuosieyiriBiostatistics and Epidemiology, University of Massachusetts Amherst, Amherst, Massachusetts, USA mmuosieyiri@umass.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0006-1016-6479
Jessie ForsythCommunity Health and Epidemiology, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, Canada.
Fernanda AndreCommunity Health and Epidemiology, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, Canada.
Ana Paula Ferrão da Silva AdoniProvincial Hospital of Inhambane, Mozambique, Inhambane, Mozambique.
Nazeem MuhajarineCommunity Health and Epidemiology, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, Canada.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6781-5421

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesThe objectives of this study are to determine whether the additional clinical criteria of the Mozambique maternal near miss abstraction tool enhance the effectiveness of the original WHO abstraction tool in identifying maternal near miss cases and also evaluate the impact of sociodemographic factors on maternal near miss identification.

designCross-sectional study.

settingTwo secondary referral hospitals in Inhambane province, Mozambique from 2021 to 2022.

participantsFrom August 2021 to February 2022, 2057 women presenting at two hospitals in Inhambane Province, Mozambique, were consecutively enrolled. Eligible participants included women admitted during pregnancy, labour, delivery, or up to 42 days post partum. Selection criteria focused on women experiencing obstetric complications, while those without complications or with incomplete medical records were excluded. PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary outcome was identifying maternal near miss cases using the original WHO Disease criterion and the additional clinical criteria from the Mozambique-Canada Maternal Health Project abstraction tool. Secondary outcomes included the association between sociodemographic factors and maternal near miss identification. All outcomes were measured as planned in the study protocol.

resultsThe new Mozambique-Canada abstraction tool identified more maternal near miss cases (28.2% for expanded disease and 21.1% for comorbidities) compared with the original WHO tool (16.2%). Hypertension and anaemia from the newer criteria were strongly associated with the original WHO Disease criterion (p<0.001), with kappa values of 0.58 (95% CI 0.53 to 0.63) and 0.21 (95% CI 0.16 to 0.26), respectively. Distance to health facilities was significantly associated, with women living over 8 km away having higher odds (OR=2.47, 95% CI 1.92 to 3.18, p<0.001). Type of hospital also influenced identification, with lower odds at Vilankulo Rural Hospital for Expanded Disease criterion (OR=0.70, 95% CI 0.57 to 0.87, p=0.001), but higher odds for comorbidities criterion (OR=3.13, 95% CI 2.40 to 4.08, p<0.001). Finally, older age was associated with higher odds of identification under the comorbidities criterion, particularly for women aged 30-39 (OR=3.06, 95% CI 2.15 to 4.36) as well as those 40 years or older (OR=4.73, 95% CI 2.43 to 9.20, p<0.001).

conclusionsThe Mozambique-Canada Maternal Health Project tool enhances maternal near miss identification over the original WHO tool by incorporating expanded clinical criteria, particularly for conditions like hypertension and anaemia. Sociodemographic factors, including healthcare access, hospital type and maternal age, significantly impact near miss detection. These findings support integrating the expanded criteria into the WHO tool for improved identification of maternal near misses in Mozambique and similar low-resource settings. Future research should examine the tool's effectiveness across varied healthcare contexts and populations.

Indexed as

Near Miss, HealthcareAdultCanadaCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansMaternal HealthMozambiquePregnancyPregnancy ComplicationsYoung AdultHealth ServicesHospitalizationOBSTETRICSPUBLIC HEALTH

Identifiers

PMID39622573
PMCPMC11624697

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.