ArticleBMJ open2024
Home self-management of type 2 diabetes with diabetes technologies in northern France: a focused ethnographic study protocol.
Article in BMJ open, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionType 2 diabetes is a chronic condition associated with impaired glucose tolerance and a high prevalence of comorbidity, polypharmacy and medication safety incidents. Little is known about the patient work associated with using diabetes management technologies by patients and their informal caregivers at home. This study aims to apply a systems engineering approach to better understand this work. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This is a qualitative focused ethnographic study using interview and photography. Adults, living independently at home, with type 2 diabetes who have been using insulin as part of their treatment regimen for a minimum of 6 months and who are using at least one diabetes management technology without support of a professional at home are eligible for inclusion. Participants will be recruited through advertisements on social media, in diabetes clinics and by contacting associations of persons living with diabetes and diabetes specialists. Participant consent will be taken, interviews will be undertaken in the participant's home, audio-recorded and photographs securely saved. The Systems Engineering Initiative for Patient Safety (SEIPS) model will frame the data coding and we will develop new codes to accommodate data outside the SEIPS model. Results will be interpreted to produce a description of work processes, work system elements and interactions that support or jeopardise the achievement of safety. This protocol will follow the consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research checklist for the reporting of qualitative research interviews. ETHICAL CONSIDERATIONS AND DISSEMINATION: This protocol was approved by the University of Lille's Behavioural Sciences Ethics Committee. The study will comply with data protection legislation: the protocol has been declared by the Data Protection Officer of the University of Lille to the National Commission on Informatics and Liberty. We plan to disseminate our findings via presentations at relevant patient/public, professional, academic and scientific meetings, and publish in a peer-reviewed journal.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.