ArticleMultiple sclerosis and related disorders2025
Incorporation of the central vein sign into the McDonald criteria.
Article in Multiple sclerosis and related disorders, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Salivary cortisol as a neuroendocrine stress biomarker for xerostomia in multiple sclerosis patients: a comparative cross-sectional study.BMC oral health · 2026Article
- Implementing the 2024 revision of the McDonald diagnostic criteria for multiple sclerosis in Germany: Practical considerations and consensus recommendations.Therapeutic advances in neurological disorders · 2026Review
- The Kappa Free Light Chains Index and Central Vein Sign: Two New Biomarkers for Multiple Sclerosis Diagnosis.Neurology and therapy · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
30 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundDiagnosis of multiple sclerosis (MS) frequently relies on MRI dissemination in time (DIT) and space (DIS), as codified in 2017 McDonald criteria (McD 2017). The central vein sign (CVS) is a proposed MS diagnostic biomarker, but its optimal incorporation into McD 2017 has not been extensively studied.
objectiveEvaluate the diagnostic performance of several methods incorporating CVS into McD 2017 radiological DIS criteria.
methodsData were obtained from the CAVS-MS Pilot, a cross-sectional, international multi-center study conducted by the North American Imaging in MS Cooperative (NAIMS) that recruited adults referred for suspicion/diagnosis of demyelinating disease. Diagnostic performance of methods incorporating CVS into McD 2017 radiological DIS were evaluated by comparing sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy.
results78 participants (37 MS, 41 others) were included. For MS diagnosis, sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of DIS based on brain imaging (DIS-B) alone was 92 %, 69 %, and 78 %. Requiring at least one lesion with CVS in any brain location in addition to DIS-B increased specificity (sensitivity 92 %, specificity 81 %, accuracy 86 %). Presence of 2 deep white matter lesions with CVS as an additional topography for DIS-B had higher sensitivity (sensitivity 97 %, specificity 59 %, accuracy 77 %).
conclusionsIncorporation of CVS in McD 2017 DIS criteria can be used to improve diagnostic accuracy. Validation in additional prospective studies is needed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.