ArticleBlood transfusion = Trasfusione del sangue2025
How do we transfuse children in Italy? Results of a national survey.
Article in Blood transfusion = Trasfusione del sangue, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
21 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAdherence to optimal practices in the preparation and issuance of pediatric blood components can significantly influence patient care outcomes. This study aims to examine the blood banking procedures across prominent Italian children's hospitals, with the goal of identifying both consistent and potentially divergent standards within this field. MATERIALS AND
methodsA survey was conducted among the blood banks affiliated with the Italian Association of Pediatric Hospitals. Modeled after the AABB Neonatal and Pediatric Blood Bank Practices Survey, the questionnaire comprised 25 questions covering hospital characteristics, definitions of the neonatal period, pre-transfusion tests, blood component availability, and irradiation protocols.
resultsFourteen out of the sixteen invited blood banks participated in the survey. The findings revealed a wide range of practices among the surveyed hospitals. Major differences were noted in the neonatal period definition, pre-transfusion compatibility procedures, and platelet transfusion protocols. All hospitals provided leukodepleted packed red blood cells (pRBCs), with differences in availability of autologous blood and reconstituted whole blood. Irradiated blood components were universally accessible, with differences in post-irradiation acceptable storage time. Additionally, differences in dosages for packed red blood cells (pRBCs) and platelet concentrates (PCs) were observed across hospitals.
conclusionsStandardized guidelines for pediatric transfusion practices within Italian blood banks are of paramount importance. The observed variability underscores the necessity for sharing best practices among centers supplying blood components to pediatric patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.