Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39621794›Full record

ArticlePLoS neglected tropical diseases2024

Dose-response effects of multiple Ascaris suum exposures and their impact on lung protection during larval ascariasis.

Chiara Cássia Oliveira Amorim, Denise Silva Nogueira, Ana Clara Gazzinelli-Guimarães, Thais Leal-Silva, Fernando Sérgio Barbosa, Fabrício Marcus Silva Oliveira, Lucas Rocha Kraemer, Raquel Martins de Almeida, Jorge Lucas Nascimento Souza, Luisa Mourão Dias Magalhães and 5 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS neglected tropical diseases, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Chronic Cholestatic Liver Disease Induced by Larval Ascariasis: Novel Insights Into Immune-Mediated Pathogenesis and Hepatic Fibrosis in Mice.FASEB journal : official publication of the Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Chiara Cássia Oliveira AmorimLaboratory of Immunobiology and Parasite Control, Department of Parasitology, Institute of Biological Sciences, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Minas Gerais, Brazil.
Denise Silva NogueiraFederal District Health Department (SES/DF), Distrito Federal, Brazil.
Ana Clara Gazzinelli-GuimarãesLaboratory of Immunobiology and Parasite Control, Department of Parasitology, Institute of Biological Sciences, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Minas Gerais, Brazil.
Thais Leal-SilvaLaboratory of Immunobiology and Parasite Control, Department of Parasitology, Institute of Biological Sciences, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Minas Gerais, Brazil.
Fernando Sérgio BarbosaLaboratory of Immunobiology and Parasite Control, Department of Parasitology, Institute of Biological Sciences, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Minas Gerais, Brazil.
Fabrício Marcus Silva OliveiraLaboratory of Immunobiology and Parasite Control, Department of Parasitology, Institute of Biological Sciences, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Minas Gerais, Brazil.
Lucas Rocha KraemerLaboratory of Immunobiology and Parasite Control, Department of Parasitology, Institute of Biological Sciences, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Minas Gerais, Brazil.
Raquel Martins de AlmeidaLaboratory of Immunobiology and Parasite Control, Department of Parasitology, Institute of Biological Sciences, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Minas Gerais, Brazil.
Jorge Lucas Nascimento SouzaLaboratory of Immunobiology and Parasite Control, Department of Parasitology, Institute of Biological Sciences, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Minas Gerais, Brazil.
Luisa Mourão Dias MagalhãesLaboratory of Interactions in ImmunoParasitology, Department of Parasitology, Institute of Biological Sciences, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Minas Gerais, Brazil.
Remo Castro RussoLaboratory of Pulmonary Immunology and Mechanics, Department of Physiology and Biophysics, Institute of Biological Sciences, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Minas Gerais, Brazil.
Marcelo Vidigal CaliariDepartment of General Pathology, Institute of Biological Sciences, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Minas Gerais, Brazil.
Soraya GazeCellular and Molecular Immunology Group, René Rachou Institute, Oswaldo Cruz Foundation-FIOCRUZ, Minas Gerais, Brazil.
Lilian Lacerda BuenoLaboratory of Immunobiology and Parasite Control, Department of Parasitology, Institute of Biological Sciences, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Minas Gerais, Brazil.
Ricardo Toshio FujiwaraLaboratory of Immunobiology and Parasite Control, Department of Parasitology, Institute of Biological Sciences, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Minas Gerais, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-4713-575X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundHuman ascariasis is the most prevalent geohelminthiasis worldwide, affecting approximately 446 million individuals. In regions with endemic prevalence, the majority of infected adults are frequently exposed to the parasite and tend to have a low parasite load. Further studies are necessary to provide more evidence on the dynamics of infection and to elucidate the possible mechanisms involved in regulating protection, especially during the acute phase, also known as larval ascariasis. The aim of this study is to compare the impact of lung function between single and multiple infections in a murine model.

methodsWe infected BALB/c mice considering the frequency of exposures: single-exposure-SI; twice-exposures-RE 2x and thrice-exposures-RE 3x, and considering the doses of infection: 25 eggs-RE 25; 250 eggs-RE 250 and 2,500 eggs-RE 2500, followed by infection challenge with 2,500 eggs. From this, we evaluated: parasite burden in lungs, cellular and humoral response, histopathological and physiological alterations in lungs.

resultsThe main results showed a reduction of parasite burden in the reinfected groups compared to the single-infected group, with protection increasing with higher exposure and dose. Furthermore, the RE 250 group exhibited a decrease of parasite burden close to RE 2500, but with less tissue damage, displaying the most favorable prognosis among the reinfected groups.

conclusionOur research indicates a dose-dependent relationship between antibody production and the intensity of the immune response required to regulate the parasite burden.

Indexed as

AscariasisAscaris suumLungMice, Inbred BALB CAnimalsAntibodies, HelminthDisease Models, AnimalFemaleLarvaMiceParasite LoadAntibodies, Helminth

Identifiers

PMID39621794
PMCPMC11637409

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.