Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39621791›Full record

ArticlePLoS medicine2024

Conditional cash transfers and mortality in people hospitalised with psychiatric disorders: A cohort study of the Brazilian Bolsa Família Programme.

Camila Bonfim, Flávia Alves, Érika Fialho, John A Naslund, Maurício L Barreto, Vikram Patel, Daiane Borges Machado

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Observational
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Camila BonfimCentre of Data and Knowledge Integration for Health (CIDACS), Fiocruz-Bahia, Salvador, Bahia, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8361-6721
Flávia AlvesCentre of Data and Knowledge Integration for Health (CIDACS), Fiocruz-Bahia, Salvador, Bahia, Brazil.
Érika FialhoCentre of Data and Knowledge Integration for Health (CIDACS), Fiocruz-Bahia, Salvador, Bahia, Brazil.
John A NaslundDepartment of Global Health and Social Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, United States of America.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6777-0104
Maurício L BarretoCentre of Data and Knowledge Integration for Health (CIDACS), Fiocruz-Bahia, Salvador, Bahia, Brazil.
Vikram PatelDepartment of Global Health and Social Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, United States of America.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1066-8584
Daiane Borges MachadoCentre of Data and Knowledge Integration for Health (CIDACS), Fiocruz-Bahia, Salvador, Bahia, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2959-4650

Funding

The impact of social drivers, conditional cash transfers and their mechanisms on mental health of the young: an integrated retrospective and forecasting approach using the 100 million Brazilian CohortR01MH128911 · NIMH · FUNDACAO OSWALDO CRUZ · PI Daiane Borges Machado · 2022 to 2026
$1.9M
NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH128911
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPsychiatric patients experience lower life expectancy compared to the general population. Conditional cash transfer programmes (CCTPs) have shown promise in reducing mortality rates, but their impact on psychiatric patients has been unclear. This study tests the association between being a Brazilian Bolsa Família Programme (BFP) recipient and the risk of mortality among people previously hospitalised with any psychiatric disorders. METHODS AND

findingsThis cohort study utilised Brazilian administrative datasets, linking social and health system data from the 100 Million Brazilian Cohort, a population-representative study. We followed individuals who applied for BFP following a single hospitalisation with a psychiatric disorder between 2008 and 2015. The outcome was mortality and specific causes, defined according to International Classification of Diseases 10th Revision (ICD-10). Cox proportional hazards models estimated the hazard ratio (HR) for overall mortality and competing risks models estimated the HR for specific causes of death, both associated with being a BFP recipient, adjusted for confounders, and weighted with a propensity score. We included 69,901 psychiatric patients aged between 10 and 120, with the majority being male (60.5%), and 26,556 (37.99%) received BFP following hospitalisation. BFP was associated with reduced overall mortality (HR 0.93, 95% CI 0.87,0.98, p 0.018) and mortality due to natural causes (HR 0.89, 95% CI 0.83, 0.96, p < 0.001). Reduction in suicide (HR 0.90, 95% CI 0.68, 1.21, p = 0.514) was observed, although it was not statistically significant. The BFP's effects on overall mortality were more pronounced in females and younger individuals. In addition, 4% of deaths could have been prevented if BFP had been present (population attributable risk (PAF) = 4%, 95% CI 0.06, 7.10).

conclusionsBFP appears to reduce mortality rates among psychiatric patients. While not designed to address elevated mortality risk in this population, this study highlights the potential for poverty alleviation programmes to mitigate mortality rates in one of the highest-risk population subgroups.

Indexed as

HospitalizationMental DisordersAdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overBrazilCause of DeathChildCohort StudiesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedProportional Hazards ModelsYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID39621791
PMCPMC11649113

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.