Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39621778›Full record

ArticlePLoS computational biology2024

Image-based force inference by biomechanical simulation.

Michiel Vanslambrouck, Wim Thiels, Jef Vangheel, Casper van Bavel, Bart Smeets, Rob Jelier

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS computational biology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Apico-basal intercalations enable the integrity of curved epithelia.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Michiel VanslambrouckCMPG, M2S Department, KU Leuven, Heverlee, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0001-5570-0395
Wim ThielsCMPG, M2S Department, KU Leuven, Heverlee, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0003-3183-6209
Jef VangheelMeBioS, Department of Biosystems, KU Leuven, Heverlee, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0001-5899-8326
Casper van BavelCMPG, M2S Department, KU Leuven, Heverlee, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0001-7925-4828
Bart SmeetsMeBioS, Department of Biosystems, KU Leuven, Heverlee, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0001-8753-781X
Rob JelierCMPG, M2S Department, KU Leuven, Heverlee, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0002-6395-1407

Funding

FWO Aspirant grantsFWO research grant
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

During morphogenesis, cells precisely generate forces that drive cell shape changes and cellular motion. These forces predominantly arise from contractility of the actomyosin cortex, allowing for cortical tension, protrusion formation, and cell division. Image-based force inference can derive such forces from microscopy images, without complicated and time-consuming experimental set-ups. However, current methods do not account for common effects, such as physical confinement and local force generation. Here we propose a force-inference method based on a biophysical model of cell shape, and assess relative cellular surface tension, adhesive tension between cells, as well as cytokinesis and protrusion formation. We applied our method on fluorescent microscopy images of the early C. elegans embryo. Predictions for cell surface tension at the 7-cell stage were validated by measurements using cortical laser ablation. Our non-invasive method facilitates the accurate tracking of force generation, and offers many new perspectives for studying morphogenesis.

Indexed as

Caenorhabditis elegansModels, BiologicalAnimalsBiomechanical PhenomenaCell ShapeComputational BiologyComputer SimulationCytokinesisEmbryo, NonmammalianMicroscopy, FluorescenceMorphogenesis

Identifiers

PMID39621778
PMCPMC11637313

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.