Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39621707›Full record

ArticlePloS one2024

Practitioner preferences in the analysis of cremation deposits in archaeology and biological anthropology: An overview of current osteoarchaeological practices with a focus on sex estimation.

Marta Hlad, Tessi Löffelmann, Jacob I Griffith, Hannah F James, Martine Vercauteren, Christophe Snoeck, Barbara Veselka

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Marta HladArchaeology, Environmental Changes, and Geo-Chemistry (AMGC), Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussels, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0002-9263-4048
Tessi LöffelmannArchaeology, Environmental Changes, and Geo-Chemistry (AMGC), Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussels, Belgium.
Jacob I GriffithArchaeology, Environmental Changes, and Geo-Chemistry (AMGC), Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussels, Belgium.
Hannah F JamesArchaeology, Environmental Changes, and Geo-Chemistry (AMGC), Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussels, Belgium.
Martine VercauterenResearch Unit Anthropology and Human Genetics, Faculty of Science, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium.
Christophe SnoeckArchaeology, Environmental Changes, and Geo-Chemistry (AMGC), Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussels, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0003-3770-4055
Barbara VeselkaArchaeology, Environmental Changes, and Geo-Chemistry (AMGC), Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussels, Belgium.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Osteological data, such as biological sex, constitute a base for research in paleodemography and palaeopathology, as well as for understanding past socio-cultural practices. Despite extensive research efforts concerning cremated human remains over the past decades, an internationally acknowledged, standardized osteological protocol is not fully agreed upon. Furthermore, assessing cremation research practices from the literature is challenging because analysis reports are often written in the national languages of practitioners, which makes them difficult to access by an international audience. This study addresses this gap by directly reaching out to experts working with cremated human remains through an online questionnaire in Lime Survey. The aim is to identify and characterize patterns in cremation analysis practices. A particular emphasis was put on the methods of biological sex estimation. While the significance of these data is widely acknowledged, the ways in which they are obtained in practice are seldom examined. The results of this survey reveal an absence of standardization in protocols of analysis, and data collection, as well as in reporting on the cremated remains in publications and reports. Notably, the findings reveal regional preferences in methodological choices and inconsistent institutional training. A majority of respondents expressed a preference for traditional morphological methods over recently published metric and alternative methods for sex estimation. These variations underscore the complexity of establishing standardized cremation analysis protocols and highlight the importance of considering regional contexts and training in shaping future research practices.

Indexed as

ArchaeologyCremationFemaleHumansMaleSex Determination by SkeletonSurveys and Questionnaires

Identifiers

PMID39621707
PMCPMC11611176

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.