ArticlePloS one2024
Applying a cytochrome c oxidase I barcode for Leishmania species typing.
Article in PloS one, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Species delimitation has always been a challenge for taxonomists and for Leishmania studies there is no exception. Herein we attempt to display the usefulness of the mitochondrial gene Cytochrome Oxidase I-coI in classical and barcode-based approaches for Leishmania characterization. A total of 228 samples were analyzed, comprising 28 Leishmania related taxa, mainly from cultures of the Oswaldo Cruz Foundation`s Leishmania Collection. Primers were designed for amplification of coI; sequences were analyzed by distance-based indicators and both the Neighbor Joining and NeighborNet as species grouping techniques. Automatic Barcode Gap Discovery was applied to define species delimitation while for the character-based analysis a software for Barcoding with Logic formulas was employed. Final sequences of 486 bp with 238 parsimonious sites were aligned and edited. Robust groups were formed for most of the genus species, distinctive nucleotide positions in the barcode sequence were observed for 11 of them. A good agreement between the techniques applied and the original characterization was observed. Few species were not distinguished by coI: (i) L. (V.) peruviana, L. (V.) lindenbergi, and L. (V.) utingensis; (ii) L. (L.) venezuelensis and (iii) L. colombiensis and L. equatorensis with identical sequences. Some of these taxa have been, at one time or another, classified as controversial and, for most of them, a higher number of isolates should be studied to properly infer their taxonomic status. CoI represents a mitochondrial target that stands out as a taxonomically important asset with multiple advantages over other genes. This paper corresponds to the first report of coI analysis in Leishmania, a potentially advantageous target for the characterization of this parasite.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.