ArticlePloS one2024
Structural and hemodynamic analysis of Weaire-Phelan scaffolds made of Ti-alloy as bone replacement component: A preclinical investigation.
Article in PloS one, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Application of numerical simulation of upper airway flow field in pediatric obstructive sleep apnea with adenoid hypertrophy.Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In recent years, additively manufactured metallic scaffolds have generated significant interest among researchers working in the field of bone tissue engineering and orthopaedic implants. Although such intricate, porous architectures are promising as bone substitutes, they need to be thoroughly tested for structural robustness as well as their capacity for bony integration. In this present work, we introduced and preclinically evaluated the biomechanical viability of Weaire-Phelan (WP) Ti-alloy scaffolds as bone replacement components. Two distinct groups of WP scaffolds, namely WPA and WPD, of varying porosities were examined for comparative assessment. Finite element (FE) analysis, computational fluid dynamics (CFD) and uniaxial compression tests were performed on 3D printed as-built scaffolds to comprehensively evaluate the structural, hemodynamic, fatigue and morphometric properties of the two groups. The mechanical performances of the WP scaffolds of 70%, 80% 90% porous group (relative density 0.3 and lower) were found to accord with the natural trabecular bone tissue. However, WPA scaffolds demonstrated slightly superior mechanical performances as compared to WPD scaffolds (22%- 63% greater compressive modulus depending on the porosity). On the other hand, WPD scaffolds showed improved hemodynamic properties thereby implying enhanced osteogenic potential. Moreover, the range of effective elastic moduli corresponding to the WP scaffolds was found to be in good agreement with that of the natural bone tissue. As such, these designs were categorized based on their suitability at different anatomical sites. The overall performance metrics of the WP scaffolds underscore its potential for improved osseointegration, structural conformities and greater capacity for customization with enhanced manufacturability.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.