ArticlePLOS digital health2024
Neural network-based arterial diameter estimation from ultrasound data.
Article in PLOS digital health, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Wearable ultrasound: a review of core technologies and clinical applications in cardiovascular monitoring.Microsystems & nanoengineering · 2026Review
- AI modeling for outbreak prediction: A graph-neural-network approach for identifying vancomycin-resistant enterococcus carriers.PLOS digital health · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Cardiovascular diseases are the leading cause of mortality and early assessment of carotid artery abnormalities with ultrasound is key for effective prevention. Obtaining the carotid diameter waveform is essential for hemodynamic parameter extraction. However, since it is not a trivial task to automate, compact computational models are needed to operate reliably in view of physiological variability. Modern machine learning (ML) techniques hold promise for fully automated carotid diameter extraction from ultrasonic data without requiring annotation by trained clinicians. Using a conventional digital signal processing (DSP) based approach as reference, our goal is to (a) build data-driven ML models to identify and track the carotid diameter, and (b) keep the computational complexity minimal for deployment in embedded systems. A ML pipeline is developed to estimate the carotid artery diameter from Hilbert-transformed ultrasound signals acquired at 500Hz sampling frequency. The proposed ML pipeline consists of 3 processing stages: two neural-network (NN) models and a smoothing filter. The first NN, a compact 3-layer convolutional NN (CNN), is a region-of-interest (ROI) detector confining the tracking to a reduced portion of the ultrasound signal. The second NN, an 8-layer (5 convolutional, 3 fully-connected) CNN, tracks the arterial diameter. It is followed by a smoothing filter for removing any superimposed artifacts. Data was acquired from 6 subjects (4 male, 2 female, 37 ± 7 years, baseline mean arterial pressure 86.3 ± 7.6 mmHg) at rest and with diameter variation induced by paced breathing and a hand grip intervention. The label reference is extracted from a fine-tuned DSP-based approach. After training, diameter waveforms are extracted and compared to the DSP reference. The predicted diameter waveform from the proposed NN-based pipeline has near perfect temporal alignment with the reference signal and does not suffer from drift. Specifically, we obtain a Pearson correlation coefficient of r = 0.87 between prediction and reference waveforms. The mean absolute deviation of the arterial diameter prediction was quantified as 0.077 mm, corresponding to a 1% error given an average carotid artery diameter of 7.5 mm in the study population. This work proposed and evaluated an ML neural network-based pipeline to track the carotid artery diameter from an ultrasound stream of A-mode frames. By contrast to current clinical practice, the proposed solution does not rely on specialist intervention (e.g. imaging markers) to track the arterial diameter. In contrast to conventional DSP-based counterpart solutions, the ML-based approach does not require handcrafted heuristics and manual fine-tuning to produce reliable estimates. Being trainable from small cohort data and reasonably fast, it is useful for quick deployment and easy to adjust accounting for demographic variability. Finally, its reliance on A-mode ultrasound frames renders the solution promising for miniaturization and deployment in on-line clinical and ambulatory monitoring.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.