Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39621608›Full record

ArticlePLOS digital health2024

Neural network-based arterial diameter estimation from ultrasound data.

Zhuangzhuang Yu, Manolis Sifalakis, Borbála Hunyadi, Fabian Beutel

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLOS digital health, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Zhuangzhuang YuDepartment of Signal Processing & Modelling, imec The Netherlands / Holst Centre, Eindhoven, The Netherlands.
Manolis SifalakisDepartment of Signal Processing & Modelling, imec The Netherlands / Holst Centre, Eindhoven, The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0949-2094
Borbála HunyadiDepartment of Microelectronics / Signal Processing Systems, Delft University of Technology, Delft, The Netherlands.
Fabian BeutelDepartment of Health Research, imec The Netherlands / Holst Centre, Eindhoven, The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4846-3341

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cardiovascular diseases are the leading cause of mortality and early assessment of carotid artery abnormalities with ultrasound is key for effective prevention. Obtaining the carotid diameter waveform is essential for hemodynamic parameter extraction. However, since it is not a trivial task to automate, compact computational models are needed to operate reliably in view of physiological variability. Modern machine learning (ML) techniques hold promise for fully automated carotid diameter extraction from ultrasonic data without requiring annotation by trained clinicians. Using a conventional digital signal processing (DSP) based approach as reference, our goal is to (a) build data-driven ML models to identify and track the carotid diameter, and (b) keep the computational complexity minimal for deployment in embedded systems. A ML pipeline is developed to estimate the carotid artery diameter from Hilbert-transformed ultrasound signals acquired at 500Hz sampling frequency. The proposed ML pipeline consists of 3 processing stages: two neural-network (NN) models and a smoothing filter. The first NN, a compact 3-layer convolutional NN (CNN), is a region-of-interest (ROI) detector confining the tracking to a reduced portion of the ultrasound signal. The second NN, an 8-layer (5 convolutional, 3 fully-connected) CNN, tracks the arterial diameter. It is followed by a smoothing filter for removing any superimposed artifacts. Data was acquired from 6 subjects (4 male, 2 female, 37 ± 7 years, baseline mean arterial pressure 86.3 ± 7.6 mmHg) at rest and with diameter variation induced by paced breathing and a hand grip intervention. The label reference is extracted from a fine-tuned DSP-based approach. After training, diameter waveforms are extracted and compared to the DSP reference. The predicted diameter waveform from the proposed NN-based pipeline has near perfect temporal alignment with the reference signal and does not suffer from drift. Specifically, we obtain a Pearson correlation coefficient of r = 0.87 between prediction and reference waveforms. The mean absolute deviation of the arterial diameter prediction was quantified as 0.077 mm, corresponding to a 1% error given an average carotid artery diameter of 7.5 mm in the study population. This work proposed and evaluated an ML neural network-based pipeline to track the carotid artery diameter from an ultrasound stream of A-mode frames. By contrast to current clinical practice, the proposed solution does not rely on specialist intervention (e.g. imaging markers) to track the arterial diameter. In contrast to conventional DSP-based counterpart solutions, the ML-based approach does not require handcrafted heuristics and manual fine-tuning to produce reliable estimates. Being trainable from small cohort data and reasonably fast, it is useful for quick deployment and easy to adjust accounting for demographic variability. Finally, its reliance on A-mode ultrasound frames renders the solution promising for miniaturization and deployment in on-line clinical and ambulatory monitoring.

Identifiers

PMID39621608
PMCPMC11611178

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.