Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39621607›Full record

ArticlePloS one2024

Rethreading the needle: A novel molecular index of soil health (MISH) using microbial functional genes to predict soil health management.

Heather L Deel, Daniel K Manter, Jennifer M Moore

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Heather L DeelUnited States Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, Soil Management and Sugarbeet Research Unit, Fort Collins, Colorado, United States of America.
Daniel K ManterUnited States Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, Soil Management and Sugarbeet Research Unit, Fort Collins, Colorado, United States of America.
Jennifer M MooreUnited States Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, Forage Seed and Cereal Research Unit, Corvallis, Oregon, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0001-5403-8184

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Soil health relies on the actions and interactions of an abundant and diverse biological community. Current soil health assessments rely heavily on a suite of soil biological, chemical, and physical indicators, often excluding molecular information. Soil health is critical for sustainable agricultural production, and a comprehensive understanding of how microbial communities provide ecosystem services can help guide management practices. To explore the role of microbial function in soil health, 536 soil samples were collected from 26 U.S. states, representing 52 different crops and grazing lands, and analyzed for various soil health indicators. The bacterial functional profile was characterized using 16S ribosomal RNA gene sequencing paired with PICRUSt2 to predict metagenome functions. Functional data were used as predictors in eXtreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost), a powerful machine learning algorithm, and enzymes important to soil health indicators were compiled into a Molecular Index of Soil Health (MISH). The overall MISH score significantly correlated with non-molecular measures of soil health and management practice adoption. Additionally, several new enzymes were identified as potential targets to better understand microbial mediation of soil health. This low-cost, DNA-based approach to measuring soil health is robust and generalizable across climates.

Indexed as

RNA, Ribosomal, 16SSoilSoil MicrobiologyBacteriaEcosystemGenes, MicrobialMachine LearningMetagenomeMicrobiotaRNA, Ribosomal, 16SSoil

Identifiers

PMID39621607
PMCPMC11611206

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC0
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.