Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39621548›Full record

ArticleJournal of addiction medicine

Collaborating With Jails to Provide Community-based Medication for Opioid Use Disorder: Qualitative Perspectives From MOUD Treatment Providers.

Ekaterina Pivovarova, Bianca Y Planas Garcia, Peter D Friedmann, Thomas J Stopka, Claudia Santelices, Elizabeth A Evans

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of addiction medicine. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Ekaterina PivovarovaFrom the Department of Family Medicine and Community Health, University of Massachusetts Chan Medical School, Worcester, MA (EP); University of Puerto Rico Medical Sciences Campus, San Juan, Puerto Rico (BYPG); Baystate Health and University of Massachusetts Chan Medical School-Baystate, Springfield, MA (PDF), Department of Population and Quantitative Health Sciences, University of Massachusetts Chan Medical School, Worcester, MA (PDF); Department of Public Health and Community Medicine, Tufts University School of Medicine, Boston, MA (TJS); Institute for Health Equity and Social Justice Research, Northeastern University, Boston, MA (CS); and Department of Health Promotion and Policy, School of Public Health and Health Sciences, University of Massachusetts Amherst, Amherst, MA (EAE).ORCID 0000-0002-2074-8775
Bianca Y Planas Garcia
Peter D Friedmann
Thomas J Stopka
Claudia Santelices
Elizabeth A Evans

Funding

Massachusetts Justice Cooperative Opioid Innovation Network (JCOIN) Research CenterUG1DA050067 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF MASSACHUSETTS AMHERST · PI EVANS, ELIZABETH A. · 2019 to 2023
$10.5M
Increasing Referrals to Medications for Opioid Use Disorders from Drug Treatment Courts using Organizational Linkage InterventionK23DA049953 · NIDA · UNIV OF MASSACHUSETTS MED SCH WORCESTER · PI PIVOVAROVA, EKATERINA · 2020 to 2022
$612k
NIDA NIH HHS K23 DA049953NIDA NIH HHS UG1 DA050067
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesAs carceral settings increasingly offer medications for opioid use disorders (MOUD), community-based providers will need to navigate relationships with correctional agencies to ensure continuity of MOUD upon release. Although collaboration has been identified as critical between agencies, limited research is available that details how providers can work with jails. We describe the perspectives of MOUD providers about their experiences collaborating with jails that had recently begun to offer MOUD.

methodsWe conducted hour-long interviews with 36 MOUD providers from 18 community-based agencies. Exploration, Preparation, Implementation, and Sustainment (EPIS) concepts informed data collection and analysis.

resultsMOUD providers described agency-specific (inner context) factors that facilitated collaboration, including staffing (employing staff with knowledge of co-occurring conditions) and agency culture (adaptability to change, recognition of gaps in services, being judgment-free). Providers also reported external factors as facilitators, such as broad community support of MOUD services and provision of training about MOUD to jail staff. Holding regular meetings, with a dedicated contact person, helped to overcome communication problems. However, the fragmentation of in-jail treatment services, exacerbated by jails' contracting with different healthcare providers, made it difficult to coordinate re-entry and establish agency relationships. Actively and intentionally building interagency partnerships and collaborating across interagency cultural and structural differences were bridging factors that developed and sustained collaborations.

conclusionsOur findings offer promising suggestions for establishing collaborations with carceral partners, including assessing internal agency conditions, seeking external community supports, committing to actively engaging and sustaining collaborations, and using interagency differences to develop mutually beneficial relationships.

Indexed as

JailsOpiate Substitution TreatmentOpioid-Related DisordersAdultCooperative BehaviorFemaleHumansMaleQualitative Research

Identifiers

PMID39621548
PMCPMC11790359

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.