ArticleCancer medicine2024
Anemia Risk Prediction Model for Osteosarcoma Patients Post-Chemotherapy Using Artificial Intelligence.
Article in Cancer medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Development and validation of a machine learning-based predictive model for chemotherapy-induced myelosuppression in colorectal cancer patients.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
- Artificial Intelligence in Patient Blood Management: A Systematic Review of Predictive, Diagnostic, and Decision Support Applications.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
- Effect of recombinant human erythropoietin on postoperative anemia in children and adolescents undergoing osteosarcoma and potential influencing factors: a single-center retrospective study.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveThis study aimed to develop a machine learning model for predicting anemia post-chemotherapy in osteosarcoma patients.
methodsClinical data from 631 osteosarcoma patients were collected, and after data filtering, a training set and validation set were created. Various statistical tests were conducted on the data, and single-factor and multiple-factor logistic regression analysis, random forest (RF), support vector machine (SVM), and least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) were used to construct risk prediction models. A new model was created by intersecting the above models to identify common risk factors, and a nomogram was developed to display the new model. The model's performance was validated using the validation set.
resultsTwenty-five risk factors were identified in the anemia group compared to the non-anemia group (p < 0.05). Single-factor logistic regression analysis identified 22 risk factors (AUC 0.895), whereas multiple-factor logistic regression analysis identified 8 risk factors (AUC 0.872), RF identified 7 risk factors (AUC 0.851), SVM identified 16 risk factors (AUC 0.851), and LASSO identified 19 risk factors (AUC 0.902). Five common risk factors (ALB, Ca, CREA, D-dimer, and ESR) were identified through model intersection, yielding a new model with an AUC of 0.85. Internal validation of the new model showed an AUC of 0.802, indicating high predictive ability. A web model application was created (https://anemic-prediction-of-osteosarcoma.shinyapps.io/DynNomapp/).
conclusionThe developed risk prediction model based on clinical and laboratory data can aid in individualized diagnosis and treatment of anemia in osteosarcoma patients post-chemotherapy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.