ArticleBrazilian journal of microbiology : [publication of the Brazilian Society for Microbiology]2025
Study on the early diagnostic value of nanopore sequencing in alveolar lavage fluid smear-negative pulmonary tuberculosis.
Article in Brazilian journal of microbiology : [publication of the Brazilian Society for Microbiology], 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Nanopore Sequencing in Mycobacterial Diagnostics: Clinical and Laboratory Roles of mNGS and tNGS.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Transforming tuberculosis diagnosis with clinical metagenomics: progress and roadblocks.Journal of clinical microbiology · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The objective of this study was to investigate the early diagnostic value of nanopore sequencing in alveolar lavage smear-negative pulmonary tuberculosis (PTB). A prospective study was conducted on patients hospitalized at Zhuzhou Central Hospital from October 2021 to June 2022 and suspected to have PTB. Alveolar lavage fluid specimens were collected from these patients and simultaneously subjected to centrifugal bacterial collection smear method in a sandwich cup, bifidobacteria solid culture (referred to as culture), Mycobacterium tuberculosis-DNA (TB-DNA), and nanopore sequencing for detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis. These patients were ultimately diagnosed with smear-negative PTB. The final clinical diagnosis was used as a reference to compare the diagnostic efficacy of Nanopore sequencing, culture, and TB-DNA for PTB. The results showed that the positive rates detected by nanopore sequencing, culture, and TB-DNA in the 103 suspected tuberculosis patients were 73.8%, 13.6%, and 33.0%, respectively. The sensitivity of nanopore sequencing was significantly higher than culture (P < 0.001) and TB-DNA (P < 0.001) for the identification of smear-negative PTB. Similarly, the positive rate of TB-DNA was also significantly higher than that of culture (P = 0.001). In conclusion, nanopore sequencing exhibited the highest sensitivity for the rapid diagnosis of Mycobacterium tuberculosis in alveolar lavage fluid specimens, using clinical diagnosis as a reference standard, and it could improve the PTB clinical diagnosis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.