Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39621251›Full record

SynthesisJournal of epidemiology and global health2024

Prevalence of Potentially Inappropriate Prescribing in Older Adults in Gulf Cooperation Council Countries: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Abdullah A Alshehri, Wael Y Khawagi, Sara M Alqahtani, Reem M Aljohani, Reuof M Aldajani, Manal S Althobaiti, Teef T Alzlami, Akshaya Srikanth Bhagavathula

Abstract readSystematic ReviewMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Journal of epidemiology and global health, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Regional research priorities for medication safety and pharmacovigilance in gulf cooperation council countries: a modified Delphi consensus study.Saudi pharmaceutical journal : SPJ : the official publication of the Saudi Pharmaceutical Society · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Abdullah A AlshehriDepartment of Clinical Pharmacy, College of Pharmacy, Taif University, Al Hawiyah, Taif, 26571, Saudi Arabia. a.aalshehri@tu.edu.sa.ORCID 0000-0002-4785-4551
Wael Y KhawagiDepartment of Clinical Pharmacy, College of Pharmacy, Taif University, Al Hawiyah, Taif, 26571, Saudi Arabia.ORCID 0000-0002-9489-1697
Sara M AlqahtaniClinical Pharmacy Student, College of Pharmacy, Taif University, Al Hawiyah, Taif, Saudi Arabia.
Reem M AljohaniClinical Pharmacy Student, College of Pharmacy, Taif University, Al Hawiyah, Taif, Saudi Arabia.
Reuof M AldajaniClinical Pharmacy Student, College of Pharmacy, Taif University, Al Hawiyah, Taif, Saudi Arabia.
Manal S AlthobaitiClinical Pharmacy Student, College of Pharmacy, Taif University, Al Hawiyah, Taif, Saudi Arabia.
Teef T AlzlamiClinical Pharmacy Student, College of Pharmacy, Taif University, Al Hawiyah, Taif, Saudi Arabia.
Akshaya Srikanth BhagavathulaDepartment of Public Health, North Dakota State University, Fargo, ND, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-0581-7808

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionPotentially Inappropriate Prescribing (PIP) poses a significant risk to patient safety and associated with poor healthcare outcomes in Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC) countries. This study aimed to assess PIP prevalence and patterns in older adults across all care settings in GCC.

methodsA comprehensive search was conducted on six medical databases to identify studies assessing the PIP prevalence in older adults using validated criteria in GCC. Pooled prevalence estimates and odds ratios were calculated using STATA Software (version 16). Statistical heterogeneity was evaluated with the I² statistic, and publication bias was assessed using funnel plot symmetry and Egger's regression test. The risk of bias was assessed using the JBI Prevalence Critical Appraisal Tool.

resultsFourteen eligible studies conducted over ten years included 18,647 patients. The median prevalence of PIP was 54.4% (IQR: 37.6-62.1%), higher in hospital settings (59.5%; IQR: 53.7-65.3%) compared to primary care (44.2%; IQR: 18.5-54.4%). Cardiovascular medications were the most common PIP (15,353 occurrences). Polypharmacy was significantly associated with PIP exposure (OR: 5.26; 95% CI: 2.33-11.84). The odds of PIP exposure were significantly increased among older individuals with chronic kidney disease (OR: 1.87; 95% CI: 1.19-2.54) and diabetes (OR: 1.74; 95% CI: 1.18-2.30).

conclusionThis study highlights high PIP prevalence among older adults in GCC countries, particularly in hospital settings. Polypharmacy and certain chronic conditions were significantly associated with PIP exposure. These findings emphasize the need for targeted interventions to improve prescribing practices and medication safety.

Indexed as

Inappropriate PrescribingAgedAged, 80 and overHumansMiddle EastPolypharmacyPotentially Inappropriate Medication ListPrevalenceBeers criteriaElderlyInappropriate prescribingMedication safetyMeta-analysisPrescribing safetySystematic review

Identifiers

PMID39621251
PMCPMC11652605

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.