ArticleInfection2025
Syncopes, paresis and loss of vision after COVID-19 mRNA-based vaccination and SARS-CoV-2 infection.
Article in Infection, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Immunotherapy-related cardiovascular toxicity: from mechanisms to management.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2026Review
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
mRNA-based vaccines played a key role in fighting the global COVID-19 pandemic by saving millions of lives. In rare cases, however, the BNT162b2 vaccine has been associated with severe adverse reactions e.g. myocarditis (OE ratio 2.78; 95% CI 2.61; 2.95) [Faksova in Vaccine 42(9):2200-2211, 2024, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vaccine.2024.01.100 , Schwab in Clin Res Cardiol 112(3):431-440, 2022, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00392-022-02129-5 ]. Here, we describe the case of a 38-year-old man who developed a wide variety of long-term symptoms (fatigue, dizziness, palpitations with recurrent syncopes, paresthesia, paresis and fasciculations) following his first mRNA-based BNT162b2 COVID-19 vaccination. 143 days after vaccination, a subsequent COVID-19 infection was associated with exacerbation of paresis and a temporary loss of vision. After ruling out other causes and due to the immediate temporal association, an adverse reaction to vaccination appears likely. The fact that these symptoms worsened after a subsequent acute COVID 19 infection hints at the possibility of a common underlying pathophysiology. This case combines two clinical phenomena that have emerged during the COVID 19 pandemic, side effects associated with novel vaccines and Post-COVID Syndrome.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.