ArticleHepatology international2025
The effect of transition timing of regorafenib on treatment outcomes in unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma: a real-world study.
Article in Hepatology international, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundRegorafenib is the recommended second-line therapy for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (uHCC). Our study aimed to assess the effect of transition timing to second-line therapy with regorafenib on treatment outcomes in uHCC patients.
methodsIn this retrospective study, patients were categorized into prompt transition group (PT group) or delayed transition group (DT group) based on the transition timing to second-line therapy with regorafenib following the first or subsequent occurrence of progressive disease during first-line treatment. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS), and the secondary endpoints were objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), overall survival (OS), and safety.
resultsThere were 85 and 122 patients in the PT and DT groups, respectively. The PT group demonstrated significantly better median PFS [4.5 months (95% CI 3.8-6.0) vs. 3.4 months (95% CI 2.8-4.1); HR 0.641; 95% CI 0.478-0.859; p = 0.003], ORR (24.7% vs. 9.8%, p = 0.007), DCR (69.4% vs. 54.9%, p = 0.049), and median OS [17.5 months (95% CI 13.4-not reached) vs. 10.4 months (95% CI 7.9-15.6); HR 0.613; 92% CI 0.432-0.871, p = 0.006] compared to the DT group. Moreover, the overall safety profiles were comparable between groups.
conclusionThe prompt transition to second-line therapy with regorafenib following first-line treatment progression suggests better treatment outcomes and potentially longer survival than in patients who delay the transition to second-line therapy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39621230What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.