Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39621155›Full record

ArticleLangenbeck's archives of surgery2024

A right colectomy case study: transitioning to the Hugo RAS system with a novel 3-ports technique in experienced robotic colorectal practice.

Tommaso Violante, Matteo Rottoli, Jan Colpaert, Martin Poortmans, Kim Boterbergh, Peter Potvlieghe, Ilia Van Campenhout, Bert Van Den Bossche

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Langenbeck's archives of surgery, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Tommaso Violante *General Abdominal Surgery, ASZ Hospital, Merestraat 80, Aalst, 9300, Belgium.
Matteo Rottoli *Surgery of the Alimentary Tract, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Bologna, Italy.
Jan ColpaertGeneral Abdominal Surgery, ASZ Hospital, Merestraat 80, Aalst, 9300, Belgium.
Martin PoortmansGeneral Abdominal Surgery, ASZ Hospital, Merestraat 80, Aalst, 9300, Belgium.
Kim BoterberghGeneral Abdominal Surgery, ASZ Hospital, Merestraat 80, Aalst, 9300, Belgium.
Peter PotvliegheGeneral Abdominal Surgery, ASZ Hospital, Merestraat 80, Aalst, 9300, Belgium.
Ilia Van CampenhoutGeneral Abdominal Surgery, ASZ Hospital, Merestraat 80, Aalst, 9300, Belgium.
Bert Van Den BosscheGeneral Abdominal Surgery, ASZ Hospital, Merestraat 80, Aalst, 9300, Belgium. bertvandenbossche@yahoo.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionAdvancements in robotic technology have revolutionized general surgery, with new platforms and continuous improvements enhancing surgical procedures. Our unit adopted the Da Vinci Si model in 2012 and later the X model for various abdominal surgeries. In early 2023, we integrated the Hugo RAS system by Medtronic into our practice following comprehensive training. This study examines the transition of experienced robotic surgeons from the Da Vinci platform to the Hugo RAS system, focusing on robotic right hemicolectomy.

methodsWe conducted a retrospective analysis of consecutive adult patients who underwent robotic right hemicolectomy using the Da Vinci X and Hugo RAS systems. Outcomes from the latest seven cases with the Da Vinci X system were compared to the initial seven cases with the Hugo RAS system.

resultsThe baseline characteristics of the two groups were comparable, with no significant differences in age, sex, comorbidities, ASA score, or BMI. Operative times showed a trend towards being shorter with the Da Vinci X (127 ± 30 min) compared to the Hugo RAS (163 ± 43 min), but this was not statistically significant (p = 0.2). Other measures, including blood loss, anastomotic configuration, and length of hospital stay, were similar. Two non-surgical postoperative complications occurred in the Hugo RAS group, with no complications in the Da Vinci X group. There were no 30-day readmissions or reoperations in either group.

conclusionExperienced robotic surgeons can seamlessly transition to the Hugo RAS system for right hemicolectomy, achieving comparable outcomes to the Da Vinci system.

Indexed as

ColectomyRobotic Surgical ProceduresAdultAgedFemaleHumansLength of StayMaleMiddle AgedOperative TimeRetrospective StudiesDaVinciHemicolectomyHugo RASLearning curveRobotic surgery

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.