ArticleLangenbeck's archives of surgery2024
A right colectomy case study: transitioning to the Hugo RAS system with a novel 3-ports technique in experienced robotic colorectal practice.
Article in Langenbeck's archives of surgery, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Hugo RAS Versus Da Vinci in Colorectal Surgery: A Systematic Review and Outcome Meta-Analysis.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
- Robot-assisted surgery for colorectal cancer using the Hugo™ RAS system: an observational study with the initial 118 cases and a literature review.Surgery today · 2026Article
- A systematic literature review of colorectal robotic surgery with the Hugo robotic-assisted surgery (RAS) system: feasibility, safety, and clinical applications.Annals of coloproctology · 2026Review
- Robotic-Assisted Surgery for Colorectal Cancer Treatment in 2026: An Updated Narrative Review.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
- Docking optimization for right hemicolectomy with complete mesocolon excision (CME) with HUGO™ robotic system: the "Gemelli configuration".Techniques in coloproctology · 2026Article
- First world report of ICG fluorescence angiography integrated in the HUGO™ RAS system: assessment of bowel perfusion during fully robotic right hemicolectomy for cecal cancer.Updates in surgery · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionAdvancements in robotic technology have revolutionized general surgery, with new platforms and continuous improvements enhancing surgical procedures. Our unit adopted the Da Vinci Si model in 2012 and later the X model for various abdominal surgeries. In early 2023, we integrated the Hugo RAS system by Medtronic into our practice following comprehensive training. This study examines the transition of experienced robotic surgeons from the Da Vinci platform to the Hugo RAS system, focusing on robotic right hemicolectomy.
methodsWe conducted a retrospective analysis of consecutive adult patients who underwent robotic right hemicolectomy using the Da Vinci X and Hugo RAS systems. Outcomes from the latest seven cases with the Da Vinci X system were compared to the initial seven cases with the Hugo RAS system.
resultsThe baseline characteristics of the two groups were comparable, with no significant differences in age, sex, comorbidities, ASA score, or BMI. Operative times showed a trend towards being shorter with the Da Vinci X (127 ± 30 min) compared to the Hugo RAS (163 ± 43 min), but this was not statistically significant (p = 0.2). Other measures, including blood loss, anastomotic configuration, and length of hospital stay, were similar. Two non-surgical postoperative complications occurred in the Hugo RAS group, with no complications in the Da Vinci X group. There were no 30-day readmissions or reoperations in either group.
conclusionExperienced robotic surgeons can seamlessly transition to the Hugo RAS system for right hemicolectomy, achieving comparable outcomes to the Da Vinci system.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39621155What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.