ArticleJournal of cancer research and clinical oncology2024
The impact of setup errors on dose distribution in cervical cancer radiotherapy and the margin from CTV to PTV.
Article in Journal of cancer research and clinical oncology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Interfractional variability and reproducibility of accumulated dose in cervical cancer radiotherapy associated with bladder volume.Radiological physics and technology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeThis study calculates the needed margin from clinical target volume (CTV) to planning target volume (PTV) in IMRT for cervical cancer. It also assesses the impact of setup errors on target and organ at risk (OAR) dose distribution.
methodsWe retrospectively analyzed 50 cervical cancer patients who underwent IMRT, with 210 CBCT scans. We calculated the CTV-to-PTV margin and simulated setup errors in the TPS to reassess dose distribution impacts on targets and OAR.
resultsSetup errors in X(anterior-posterior,AP), Y(cranial-caudal,CC), and Z(left-right,LR) directions were (1.4 ± 1.0) mm, (2.3 ± 1.5) mm, and (1.9 ± 1.2) mm, respectively, leading to CTV-to-PTV margins of 4.4 mm, 6.4 mm, and 5.8 mm. X-axis errors did not significantly affect target dosimetry (P > 0.05), but Y and Z errors did (P < 0.05). X-axis errors impacted the small intestine and rectum (P < 0.05), Y-axis errors mainly affected the colon (P < 0.05), and Z-axis errors affected the colon, small intestine, and rectum (P < 0.05).
conclusionOur study underscores the need to account for setup errors in radiotherapy for cervical cancer. Customizing the CTV-to-PTV margin based on institutional error data is key to maintaining target dose coverage and optimizing treatment outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.