ArticleWorld journal of urology2024
Minimizing infectious complications following transrectal prostate biopsy: a proposal for a risk-adapted antibiotic treatment strategy with Ceftriaxone and Ertapenem as key components.
Article in World journal of urology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeTo investigate the effect of pre-biopsy rectal swab and urine screening combined with a risk-adapted antibiotic treatment strategy on reducing post-biopsy infections (PBIs) following multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI)/ transrectal ultrasound (TRUS) fusion-targeted transrectal prostate biopsy (TRPBx).
methods1119 Patients undergoing mpMRI-TRUS fusion TRPBx between June 2017 and February 2024 were included. Patients were screened for rectal extended-spectrum beta-lactamase (ESBL)/multi-resistant gram-negative (MRGN) and urinary pathogens. Standard-risk patients (rectal non-ESBL/MRGN-carriers) either received Cefuroxime (2017-2020) or Ceftriaxone (2020-2024) intravenously before biopsy. For high-risk patients (rectal ESBL/MRGN-carriers) intravenous Ertapenem was used. Patients with positive urine cultures received oral targeted prophylaxis. PBIs were the primary outcome of the study. We used uni- and multivariable logistic regression analysis (MLRA) to reveal predictors for the main outcome.
resultsRectal ESBL/MRGN prevalence was 5.5%. For standard-risk patients, PBI-rates were 8.1% and 0.24% for Cefuroxime and Ceftriaxone (p < 0.0001), respectively. Only 1.7% of high-risk patients treated with Ertapenem developed PBI. On MLRA, Cefuroxime (OR 38.7, 95%-CI: 10.9-246), oral Ciprofloxacin (OR 103, 95%-CI: 10.8-994), other oral targeted antibiotics (OR 42.7, 95%-CI: 1.86-496) (reference Ceftriaxone, all p < 0.005) were significant predictors for PBI whereas Ertapenem (OR 7.30 95%-CI: 0.34-77.4, p = 0.11) was not.
conclusionBy integrating rectal swab ESBL/MRGN and urine screening, we developed a tailored antibiotic treatment strategy, resulting in low PBI-rates following TRPBx. Carbapenem-based treatment of high-risk patients is crucial. Ceftriaxone should be considered for routine use in standard-risk patients as it offers very low PBI-rates.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39621106What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.