Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39621089›Full record

ReviewNaunyn-Schmiedeberg's archives of pharmacology2025

Natural products as drug leads: exploring their potential in drug discovery and development.

Kuldeep Singh, Jeetendra Kumar Gupta, Dilip Kumar Chanchal, Manoj Gangadhar Shinde, Shivendra Kumar, Divya Jain, Zainab M Almarhoon, Asma M Alshahrani, Daniela Calina, Javad Sharifi-Rad and 1 more

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Naunyn-Schmiedeberg's archives of pharmacology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 33 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
33citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

33 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. From Ethnobotany to Pharmacognosy: A Review ofPlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. A Bioactive Benzyl Terpene fromMolecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Phytochemical Characterization and Biological Assessment ofAntioxidants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Kuldeep SinghDepartment of Pharmacology, Institute of Pharmaceutical Research, GLA University, Mathura, Uttar Pradesh, India.
Jeetendra Kumar GuptaDepartment of Pharmacology, Institute of Pharmaceutical Research, GLA University, Mathura, Uttar Pradesh, India.
Dilip Kumar ChanchalDepartment of Pharmacognosy, College of Pharmacy, SR Group of Institutions, Jhansi, India.
Manoj Gangadhar ShindeK.K. Wagh College of Pharmacy, Nashik, Maharashtra, India.
Shivendra KumarDepartment of Pharmacology, Rajiv Academy for Pharmacy, Mathura, Uttar Pradesh, India.
Divya JainDepartment of Microbiology, School of Applied and Life Sciences, Uttaranchal University, Dehradun, Uttarakhand, India. divyajain31011996@gmail.com.
Zainab M AlmarhoonDepartment of Chemistry, College of Science, King Saud University, P. O. Box 2455, 11451, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Asma M AlshahraniDepartment of Clinical Pharmacy, College of Pharmacy, Shaqra University, Dawadimi, Saudi Arabia.
Daniela CalinaDepartment of Clinical Pharmacy, University of Medicine and Pharmacy of Craiova, 200349, Craiova, Romania. calinadaniela@gmail.com.
Javad Sharifi-RadUniversidad Espíritu Santo, Samborondón, 092301, Ecuador. javad.sharifirad@gmail.com.
Anjali TripathiDepartment of Biotechnology, Sharda School of Engineering and Technology, Sharda University, Greater Noida, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Natural products have been pivotal in drug discovery, offering a wealth of bioactive compounds that significantly contribute to therapeutic developments. Despite the rise of synthetic chemistry, natural products continue to play a crucial role due to their unique chemical structures and diverse biological activities. This study reviews and evaluates the potential of natural products in drug discovery and development, emphasizing the integration of traditional knowledge with modern drug discovery methodologies and addressing the associated challenges. A comprehensive literature search was conducted across PubMed/MedLine, Scopus, Web of Science, Google Scholar, and Cochrane Library, covering publications from 2000 to 2023. Inclusion criteria focused on studies related to natural products, bioactive compounds, medicinal plants, phytochemistry, and AI applications in drug discovery. Data were categorized into source, extraction methods, bioactivity assays, and technological advances. The current review underscores the historical and ongoing importance of natural products in drug discovery. Technological advancements in chromatographic and spectroscopic techniques have improved the isolation and structural elucidation of bioactive compounds. AI and machine learning have streamlined the identification and optimization of natural product leads. Challenges such as biodiversity sustainability and development complexities are discussed, alongside innovative approaches like biosynthetic engineering and metagenomics. Natural products remain a vital source of novel therapeutic agents, providing unique chemical diversity and specific biological activities. Integrating traditional knowledge with modern scientific methods is essential for maximizing the potential of natural products in drug discovery. Despite existing challenges, ongoing research and technological advancements are expected to enhance the efficiency and success of natural product-based drug development.

Indexed as

Biological ProductsDrug DevelopmentDrug DiscoveryAnimalsHumansMachine LearningPlants, MedicinalBiological ProductsArtificial intelligenceBioactive compoundsDrug discoveryMedicinal plantsNatural productsPhytochemistry

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.