SynthesisEuropean journal of clinical pharmacology2025
Identification of the most cost-saving disease-modifying therapies and factors affecting the budget in the pharmacotherapy of multiple sclerosis: a systematic review.
Synthesis in European journal of clinical pharmacology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Subcutaneous Ocrelizumab for the Treatment of Relapsing Forms of Multiple Sclerosis: A Budget Impact Model.PharmacoEconomics - open · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundMultiple sclerosis (MS) is an immune-mediated disease that has a considerable health-related quality of life interference. Various disease-modifying therapies (DMTs) in MS management have been approved by the Food and Drug Administration or are currently used off-label. DMTs aim to slow down the progression of MS and decrease the frequency of relapses. This systematic review aimed to evaluate the budget impact of DMTs worldwide.
methodsA systematic search query was made to identify related articles in scientific databases. Eligible papers included their characteristics and model inputs, and results were extracted and reported. To critique the standard reporting of studies, a 32-item quality assessment checklist was used.
resultsFrom 1865 records, 22 original budget-impact analyses (BIAs) were included. All BIAs were accepted in the quality assessment (Mean score: 84.4). The most used DMT was β-interferons and natalizumab among novel DMTs. The results of BIAs were highly sensitive to the route of administration, costs of side effects and administration, and presence of biosimilars. However, glatiramer acetate has not experienced significant discounts was the most reported budget-saving DMT.
conclusionFrom the results, it can be concluded the budget impact of DMTs in managing symptoms and improving the quality of life of MS patients according to the setting included in the modeling and according to specific conditions and context is different and significantly affects the results of BIAs. For accurate predictions of the effects of DMTs on the distribution of budgets in the MS population, more specific BIAs with higher quality should be done.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39621073What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.