Observational studyClinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research2025
Active Surveillance in Patients with Extra-abdominal Desmoid-Type Fibromatosis: A Pooled Analysis of Three Prospective Observational Studies.
Observational study in Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Can MRI predict tumor behavior in desmoid-type fibromatosis during active surveillance?European radiology · 2026Article
- Predicting Failure of Active Surveillance in Desmoid-Type Fibromatosis Using Radiomics: An International Multi-center Cohort Study.Annals of surgical oncology · 2026Article
- Radiologic response assessment in patients with desmoid-type fibromatosis treated with percutaneous cryoablation.European radiology experimental · 2026Article
- Systemic Therapies for Desmoid Tumors: A Review of Past, Present, and Future Treatments.Cancers · 2026Review
- Real-World Characterization and Treatment Patterns of Patients with Desmoid Tumors at an Academic Center in the United States.Cancer research communications · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
21 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeThree prospective observational studies (Italy, the Netherlands, and France) on active surveillance (AS) in patients with extra-abdominal desmoid-type fibromatosis support AS as a first-line approach. Identifying prognostic factors for the failure of AS will help determine the strategy. The aim of this study was to investigate the prognostic impact of clinical and molecular variables in a larger series. EXPERIMENTAL
designData available as of January 31, 2024, from the three studies, in which patients were followed for ≥3 years, were pooled. Patients ≥18 years of age, with primary sporadic desmoid-type fibromatosis, and with CTNNB1 mutations available were eligible. The primary study endpoint was treatment-free survival (TFS). Secondary endpoints included the incidence of RECIST progression, spontaneous RECIST regression, and regression post-RECIST progression.
resultsPatients (n = 282) with a median follow-up of 53 months (IQR, 39-63) were included. The 3- and 5-year TFS rates were 67% and 66%, respectively; the 3- and 5-year crude cumulative incidences were 33% and 34% for RECIST progression, 26% and 34% for RECIST regression, and 33% and 38% for regression post-RECIST progression, respectively. In multivariable analysis, larger tumor size, mutation type, and tumor locations were associated with lower TFS. The specific mutation (S45F), larger tumor size, and extremity and trunk locations were all associated with a lower probability of spontaneous RECIST regression.
conclusionsThis study confirms that spontaneous regression occurs in a significant proportion of patients and that two-thirds are treatment free at 5 years. Initial tumor size, CTNNB1 mutation, and location should be factored into the initial decision-making process.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.