ArticleJournal of applied clinical medical physics2025
Five-year evaluation of linear accelerator-based SRS platform isocentricity.
Article in Journal of applied clinical medical physics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Measurement of shrinking immobilizing sheets for radiotherapy using a near-infrared camera.Radiological physics and technology · 2025Article
- Clinical implementation of a multifaceted quality assurance phantom for high-precision radiation therapy: an institutional experience.Journal of the Egyptian National Cancer Institute · 2025Article
- Improving dose delivery in non-coplanar cranial SRS: Stereoscopic x-ray-guided mitigation of table walkout errors.Journal of applied clinical medical physics · 2025Article
- Local recurrence and radionecrosis after single-isocenter multiple targets stereotactic radiotherapy for brain metastases.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Five-year evaluation of linear accelerator-based SRS platform isocentricity.Journal of applied clinical medical physics · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Linear accelerator (LINAC)-based stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) has become a mainstay in the management of intracranial tumors. However, the high fractional doses and sharp gradients used in SRS place heavy demands on geometric accuracy. Image guidance systems such as ExacTrac (ETX, Brainlab AG, Munich, Germany) have been developed to facilitate position verification at nonzero table angles. Though convenient, potential loss of mechanical rigidity between the imaging and treatment systems can be cause for concern, as the ETX system is not mounted to the rotating gantry. In this retrospective study, we analyzed 518 Winston-Lutz (WL) tests performed in the last 5 years with ETX alignment on our Elekta Versa HD (Elekta AB, Stockholm, Sweden) linear accelerator to determine the achievable limits of precision and stability over time for our LINAC-based SRS platform. Results demonstrated remarkable stability over time. 3D and directional misalignments never exceeded 1.0 mm over the study period; however, table rotation was shown to be the most significant source of positional uncertainty. Gantry sag, as measured by gun-to-target misalignments at the gantry-0 and gantry-180-degree positions, was consistent, measuring 1.23 ± 0.18 mm over the study period. Measured accuracy was well within acceptable tolerances for cranial SRS treatment delivery. Notably, the use of the ETX system for intrafraction repositioning effectively eliminates couch walkout, the most significant source of uncertainty identified in this study. Our results thus corroborate safe SRS treatment delivery on our Versa HD with ExacTrac image guidance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.