Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39620883›Full record

ReviewJournal of psychiatric and mental health nursing2025

Quantitative Research Designs, Hierarchy of Evidence and Validity.

Paul Slater, Felicity Hasson

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of psychiatric and mental health nursing, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Quantitative Data Quality Assurance, Analysis and Presentation.Journal of psychiatric and mental health nursing · 2025
    Article
  8. Data Measurement, Instruments and Sampling.Journal of psychiatric and mental health nursing · 2025
    Article
  9. Substance and alcohol use in pregnant women attending antenatal care at a tertiary hospital in Johannesburg, South Africa.The South African journal of psychiatry : SAJP : the journal of the Society of Psychiatrists of South Africa · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Paul SlaterInstitute of Nursing and Health Research, Ulster University, Londonderry, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2318-0705
Felicity HassonInstitute of Nursing and Health Research, Ulster University, Londonderry, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This paper provides a summary of the main quantitative research designs. Quantitative research designs occur in a hierarchy of evidence, ranging from descriptive research designs such as cross-sectional studies, and cohort designs, to more carefully constructed experimental designs like randomised control trials (RCT's). The quality of a study's findings is determined by factors affecting its internal validity and its application to other settings is gauged by its external validity.

Indexed as

Research DesignClinical Studies as TopicHumansReproducibility of Resultsquantitativeresearch designvalidity

Identifiers

PMID39620883
PMCPMC12056466

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.