Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39620572›Full record

ArticleHip & pelvis2024

Difference of Neck Shortening in Femoral Neck Fracture between Femoral Neck System and Multiple Cannulated Cancellous Screws: Single Center, Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial.

Saurabh Gupta, Abhay Elhence, Sumit Banerjee, Sandeep Yadav, Prabodh Kantiwal, Rajesh Kumar Rajnish, Pushpinder Khera, Rajesh Malhotra

RetractedAbstract readRetracted Publication
In one paragraph

Article in Hip & pelvis, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It has been retracted, and should not be counted. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Saurabh GuptaDepartment of Orthopaedics, All India Institute of Medical Sciences (AIIMS), Jodhpur, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5133-3572
Abhay ElhenceDepartment of Orthopaedics, All India Institute of Medical Sciences (AIIMS), Jodhpur, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9655-5806
Sumit BanerjeeDepartment of Orthopaedics, All India Institute of Medical Sciences (AIIMS), Jodhpur, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5067-2230
Sandeep YadavDepartment of Orthopaedics, All India Institute of Medical Sciences (AIIMS), Jodhpur, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4356-1951
Prabodh KantiwalDepartment of Orthopaedics, All India Institute of Medical Sciences (AIIMS), Jodhpur, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6682-020X
Rajesh Kumar RajnishDepartment of Orthopaedics, All India Institute of Medical Sciences (AIIMS), Jodhpur, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2080-2612
Pushpinder KheraDepartment of Radiodiagnosis, All India Institute of Medical Sciences (AIIMS), Jodhpur, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9714-5462
Rajesh MalhotraDepartment of Orthopaedics, Indraprastha Apollo Hospital, New Delhi, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5971-003X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: Fracture union after osteosynthesis of a fracture neck femur (FNF) occurs by compression of the fracture ends and potential neck shortening. Selection of an implant for fixation of a femoral fracture of the neck can be challenging when making management decisions. Femoral neck shortening after internal fixation of FNFs using a femoral neck system (FNS) or multiple cannulated cancellous screws (MCS) was compared. Materials and Methods: This prospective interventional single-blinded randomized controlled trial was conducted at a university teaching hospital. Sixty patients undergoing internal fixation for management of sub-capital or trans-cervical FNFs were randomized and assigned, to one of the two groups-the test group (FNS group) and the control group (MCS group). Primary outcome was determined by measuring the difference in 1-year shortening of the femoral neck on radiographs between FNS and MCS. The secondary objective was to determine the correlation between neck shortening with patient reported outcome measures (PROMs) at the end of the final follow-up. Results: At the final follow-up, shortening of the femoral neck was 3.77±1.87 mm in the FNS group, significantly lower compared with the MCS group, 6.53±1.59 mm. Conclusion: Significantly less shortening of the femoral neck was observed in the FNS group compared with the MCS group. No statistically significant difference in PROMs was observed at 1-year follow-up. The findings of the study suggest that FNS can be regarded as a suitable alternative for internal fixation in young adults (<60 years) with trans-cervical and subcapital FNFs.

Indexed as

Femoral neck fracturesFemoral neck shorteningFemoral neck systemMultiple cannulated screwsProximal femoral fractures

Identifiers

PMID39620572
PMCPMC11638757

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.