ArticleHip & pelvis2024
Comparison of Analgesic Efficacy between Ultrasound-guided Supra-inguinal Fascia Iliaca Block and Pericapsular Nerve Group Block following Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Randomized Controlled Trial.
Article in Hip & pelvis, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Pericapsular nerve group block for total hip arthroplasty: A systematic review.The Journal of international medical research · 2026Pooled it
- Comparative efficacy of analgesic techniques in total hip arthroplasty : a systematic review and network meta-analysis of more than 100 randomized studies incorporating minimal clinically important difference.Bone & joint open · 2026Pooled it
- Fascia iliaca compartment block and pericapsular nerve group block effect on opioid consumption in hip fracture patients.Journal of clinical orthopaedics and trauma · 2025Article
- Pericapsular Nerve Group Block for Hip Fracture Pain Management: A Narrative Review of Emergency Applications.Journal of pain research · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: The effectiveness of pericapsular nerve group (PENG) block versus suprainguinal fascia iliaca block (SFIB) for pain relief after hip arthroplasty is a topic of ongoing debate. This study aimed to examine the association of PENG block with lower consumption of opioids during the first 24 hours following surgery compared to SFIB. Materials and Methods: In this single-center, double-blind, randomized controlled trial, 60 patients scheduled for an elective posterior approach to total hip arthroplasty (THA) were randomized according to two groups: ultrasound-guided PENG block (PENG group) or SFIB (SFIB group). The 24-hour consumption of intravenous fentanyl was the primary outcome. Secondary outcomes included perioperative consumption of intravenous fentanyl, pain scores, sensorimotor function, and functional measures. Results: No significant intergroup difference was observed in 24-hour total fentanyl consumption (SFIB group: 117.4±99.8 μg, PENG group: 145.9±122.7 μg; mean difference: 22.6 μg [95% confidence interval -36.6 to 81.8]; Conclusion: Compared to SFIB, the addition of PENG block to multimodal analgesia did not reduce fentanyl consumption or pain scores after posterior approach THA.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.