Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39620540›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of health policy and management2024

Learning From Countries on Measuring and Defining Community-Based Resilience in Health Systems: Voices From Nepal, Sierra Leone, Liberia, and Ethiopia.

Angeli Rawat, Katrina Hsu, Agazi Ameha, Asha Pun, Kebir Hassen, Aline Simen-Kapeu, Nuzhat Rafique, Macoura Oulare, Jonas Karlstrom, Sameera Hussain and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of health policy and management, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Angeli RawatSchool of Population and Public Health, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-1313-2796
Katrina HsuFaculty of Medicine, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-8380-5415
Agazi AmehaUNICEF Ethiopia Country Office, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.ORCID 0000-0002-5796-0972
Kebir HassenUNICEF Yemen Country office, Sana'a, Yemen.ORCID 0009-0008-6820-5762
Aline Simen-KapeuThe World Bank Group, Abidjan, Ivory Coast.ORCID 0000-0003-2259-1027
Nuzhat RafiqueUNICEF Field office Benghazi, Benghazi, Libya.ORCID 0000-0002-5926-9704
Macoura OulareUNICEF Regional Office West and Central Africa, Dakar, Senegal.ORCID 0000-0002-5220-4393
Jonas KarlstromSingHealth Duke-NUS Global Health Institute, Singapore, Singapore.ORCID 0000-0002-7279-428X
Sameera HussainUniversity of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada.
Kumanan RasanathanUNICEF, New York City, NY, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-9347-1765

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe best approach for defining and measuring community healthcare (CHC) resilience in times of crisis remains elusive. We aimed to synthesise definitions and indicators of resilience from countries who had recently undergone shocks (ie, outbreaks and natural disasters).

methodsWe purposively selected four countries that had recently or were currently experiencing a shock: Nepal, Ethiopia, Sierra Leone, and Liberia. Focus group discussions (FGDs) and key informant interviews (KIIs) were conducted with participants at the community, facility, district, sub-national, national, and international levels. Interviews and discussions were translated and transcribed verbatim. Data were open coded in ATLAS.ti using a grounded theory approach and were thematically collated to a pre-specified framework.

resultsA total of 486 people participated in the study (n=378 community members, n=108 non-community members). Emergent themes defining CHC resilience included: the importance of communities, health system characteristics, learning from shocks, preventing and preparing for shocks, and considerations for sustainability and intersectoral engagement. Participants identified 193 potential indicators for measuring resilience, which fell into the domains of: (1) preparedness, (2) response and recovery, (3) communities, (4) health systems, and (5) intersectoral engagement.

conclusionDespite varying definitions and understanding of the concept of resilience, community-centred responses to shocks were key in building resilience. Further insight is needed into how the definitions and indicators identified in this study compare to other shocks and contexts and can be used to further our understanding of health system resilience. Metrics and definitions could assist policy-makers, researchers, and practitioners in evaluating the readiness of systems to respond to shocks and to allow comparability across health systems. We must build health systems that can continue to function and ensure quality, equity, community-focused care, and engagement, regardless of the pressures put upon them and ensure they are linked to strong primary healthcare.

Indexed as

Resilience, PsychologicalAdultCommunity Health ServicesDelivery of Health CareDisaster PlanningEthiopiaFemaleFocus GroupsHumansLiberiaMaleMiddle AgedNatural DisastersNepalSierra LeoneCommunityHealth SystemsMonitoring and EvaluationResilience

Identifiers

PMID39620540
PMCPMC11496758

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.