Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39620424›Full record

SynthesisThe Cochrane database of systematic reviews2024

Interventions to prevent surgical site infection in adults undergoing cardiac surgery.

Cardiothoracic Interdisciplinary Research Network, Luke J Rogers, Ricky Vaja, David Bleetman, Jason M Ali, Melissa Rochon, Julie Sanders, Judith Tanner, Theresa L Lamagni, Shagorika Talukder and 4 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in The Cochrane database of systematic reviews, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07275307 (Evaluating the Effects of Prontosan Wound Gel X on the Occurrence of Superficial Surgical Site Infections in Adult Cardiac Surgery Patients), which is not on this map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07275307 recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2026, after this paper: background citation

Evaluating the Effects of Prontosan Wound Gel X on the Occurrence of Superficial Surgical Site Infections in Adult Cardiac Surgery Patients: A Single-Arm, Phase IV, Adaptive Feasibility Study

TypeobservationalSponsorIRCCS Policlinico S. DonatoRan2026 to 2027Enrolled456ConditionsSurgical Site Infection After Major SurgeryArmsApplication of Prontosan Wound Gel X
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Cardiothoracic Interdisciplinary Research NetworkLeicester Clinical Trials Unit, University of Leicester, Glenfield Hospital, Leicester, UK.
Luke J RogersBristol Heart Institute, University Hospitals Bristol and Weston NHS Foundation Trust, Bristol, UK.
Ricky VajaNational Heart and Lung Institute, Imperial College London, London, UK.
David BleetmanSt. Bartholomew's Hospital, Barts Health NHS Trust, London, UK.
Jason M AliDepartment of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Royal Papworth Hospital, Cambridge, UK.
Melissa RochonDirectorate of Infection, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
Julie SandersSt. Bartholomew's Hospital, Barts Health NHS Trust, London, UK.
Judith TannerSchool of Health Sciences, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK.
Theresa L LamagniHealthcare-Associated Infection & Antimicrobial Resistance Division, UK Health Security Agency, London, UK.
Shagorika TalukderDepartment of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Royal Papworth Hospital, Cambridge, UK.
Juan Carlos Quijano-CamposSt. Bartholomew's Hospital, Barts Health NHS Trust, London, UK.
Florence LaiLeicester Clinical Trials Unit, University of Leicester, Glenfield Hospital, Leicester, UK.
Mahmoud LoubaniDepartment of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Hull and East Yorkshire Hospitals NHS Trust, Hull, UK.
Gavin J MurphyDepartment of Cardiovascular Sciences, University of Leicester, Leicester, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSurgical site infection (SSI) is a common type of hospital-acquired infection and affects up to a third of patients following surgical procedures. It is associated with significant mortality and morbidity. In the United Kingdom alone, it is estimated to add another £30 million to the cost of adult cardiac surgery. Although generic guidance for SSI prevention exists, this is not specific to adult cardiac surgery. Furthermore, many of the risk factors for SSI are prevalent within the cardiac surgery population. Despite this, there is currently no standard of care for SSI prevention in adults undergoing cardiac surgery throughout the preoperative, intraoperative and postoperative periods of care, with variations in practice existing throughout from risk stratification, decontamination strategies and surveillance.

objectivesPrimary objective: to assess the clinical effectiveness of pre-, intra-, and postoperative interventions in the prevention of cardiac SSI. SECONDARY

objectives(i) to evaluate the effects of SSI prevention interventions on morbidity, mortality, and resource use; (ii) to evaluate the effects of SSI prevention care bundles on morbidity, mortality, and resource use. SEARCH

methodsWe searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) in the Cochrane Library, MEDLINE (Ovid, from inception) and Embase (Ovid, from inception) on 31 May 2021. CLINICALTRIALS: gov and the WHO International Clinical Trials Registry Platform (ICTRP) were also searched for ongoing or unpublished trials on 21 May 2021. No language restrictions were imposed. SELECTION CRITERIA: We included RCTs evaluating interventions to reduce SSI in adults (≥ 18 years of age) who have undergone any cardiac surgery. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: We followed the methods as per our published Cochrane protocol. Our primary outcome was surgical site infection. Our secondary outcomes were all-cause mortality, reoperation for SSI, hospital length of stay, hospital readmissions for SSI, healthcare costs and cost-effectiveness, quality of life (QoL), and adverse effects. We used the GRADE approach to assess the certainty of evidence. MAIN

resultsA total of 118 studies involving 51,854 participants were included. Twenty-two interventions to reduce SSI in adults undergoing cardiac surgery were identified. The risk of bias was judged to be high in the majority of studies. There was heterogeneity in the study populations and interventions; consequently, meta-analysis was not appropriate for many of the comparisons and these are presented as narrative summaries. We focused our reporting of findings on four comparisons deemed to be of great clinical relevance by all review authors. Decolonisation versus no decolonisation Pooled data from three studies (n = 1564) using preoperative topical oral/nasal decontamination in all patients demonstrated an uncertain direction of treatment effect in relation to total SSI (RR 0.98, 95% CI 0.70 to 1.36; I AUTHORS'

conclusionsThis review provides the broadest and most recent review of the current evidence base for interventions to reduce SSI in adults undergoing cardiac surgery. Twenty-one interventions were identified across the perioperative period. Evidence is of low to very low certainty primarily due to significant heterogeneity in how interventions were implemented and the definitions of SSI used. Knowledge gaps have been identified across a number of practices that should represent key areas for future research. Efforts to standardise SSI outcome reporting are warranted.

Indexed as

Cardiac Surgical ProceduresRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicSurgical Wound InfectionAdultBiasCause of DeathHumansIntraoperative CareLength of StayPatient Care BundlesPostoperative CarePreoperative Care

Identifiers

PMID39620424
PMCPMC11609908

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.