ArticlePain2025
A 5-day course of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation before pain onset ameliorates future pain and increases sensorimotor peak alpha frequency.
Article in Pain, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Modulation of evoked alpha oscillatory activity in the frontocentral region during analgesia by non-invasive brain stimulation.Neurotherapeutics : the journal of the American Society for Experimental NeuroTherapeutics · 2026Trial
- Peak Alpha Frequency Is Not Significantly Altered by Five Days of Experimental Pain and Repetitive Transcranial Stimulation of the Left Dorsolateral Prefrontal Cortex.The European journal of neuroscience · 2025Trial
- Identifying neural oscillation and phase synchronization abnormalities in migraine and their predictive values in transcranial magnetic stimulation.Journal of oral & facial pain and headache · 2026Article
- An update on the effects of cerebellar transcranial magnetic stimulation on cognitive function.Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2026Review
- Review
- The effect of prolonged elbow pain and rTMS on TMS-evoked potentials: A TMS-EEG study.Imaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.) · 2025Article
- Modulating cortical excitability through transcranial direct current stimulation combined with therapeutic exercise for craniofacial myofascial pain: Randomized controlled trial.Journal of oral biology and craniofacial researchArticle
Corrections and comments
- Update of
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
abstractRepetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) has shown promise as an intervention for pain. An unexplored research question is whether the delivery of rTMS prior to pain onset might protect against a future episode of prolonged pain. The present study aimed to determine whether (1) 5 consecutive days of rTMS delivered prior to experimentally induced prolonged jaw pain has a prophylactic effect on future pain intensity and (2) whether these effects were accompanied by increases in corticomotor excitability (CME) and/or sensorimotor peak alpha frequency (PAF). On each day from day 0 to 4, 40 healthy individuals received a single session of active (n = 21) or sham (n = 19) rTMS over the left primary motor cortex. Peak alpha frequency and CME were assessed on day 0 (before rTMS) and day 4 (after rTMS). Prolonged pain was induced via intramuscular injection of nerve growth factor in the right masseter muscle after the final rTMS session. From days 5 to 25, participants completed twice-daily electronic diaries including pain on chewing and yawning (primary outcomes), as well as pain during other activities (eg, talking), functional limitation in jaw function and muscle soreness (secondary outcomes). Compared to sham, individuals who received active rTMS subsequently experienced lower pain on chewing and yawning. Furthermore, active rTMS led to an increase in PAF. This is the first study to show that rTMS delivered prior to prolonged pain onset can protect against future pain. Our findings suggest that rTMS may hold promise as a prophylactic intervention for pain.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.