ArticleCurrent diabetes reviews2025
Design of a Low-Complexity Deep Learning Model for Diagnosis of Type 2 Diabetes.
Article in Current diabetes reviews, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Predictive models for intestinal obstruction: from clinical scores to artificial intelligence.Frontiers in surgery · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundRecent research demonstrates that diabetes can lead to heart problems, neurological damage, and other illnesses.
methodIn this paper, we design a low-complexity Deep Learning (DL)-based model for the diagnosis of type 2 diabetes. In our experiments, we use the publicly available PIMA Indian Diabetes Dataset (PIDD). To obtain a low-complexity and accurate DL architecture, we perform an accuracy-versus-complexity study on several DL models.
resultThe results show that the proposed DL structure, including Convolutional Neural Networks and Multi-Layer Perceptron models (i.e., CNN+MLP model) outperforms other models with an accuracy of 93.89%.
conclusionWith these features, the proposed hybrid model can be used in wearable devices and IoT-based health monitoring applications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39620332What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.