Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39620318›Full record

ArticleAnatomical record (Hoboken, N.J. : 2007)2026

Spatial relationships of oropharyngeal structures during respiration, chewing, and swallowing.

Doris Haydee Rosero Salazar, Lucas Honnlee, Phuc Hoang Nguyen, Elliot Willis, Zi-Jun Liu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Anatomical record (Hoboken, N.J. : 2007), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Feeding biomechanics in vertebrates and beyond.Anatomical record (Hoboken, N.J. : 2007) · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Pharyngeal airway dimensions and adipose distribution in the minipig.Journal of oral biology and craniofacial research
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Doris Haydee Rosero SalazarDepartment of Orthodontics, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8008-9281
Lucas HonnleeDepartment of Orthodontics, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA.
Phuc Hoang NguyenDepartment of Orthodontics, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA.
Elliot WillisDepartment of Orthodontics, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA.
Zi-Jun LiuDepartment of Orthodontics, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8233-5861

Funding

The Tongue Base in Respiration and SwallowingR01DE028864 · NIDCR · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI LIU, ZIJUN · 2020 to 2023
$1.4M
NIDCR NIH HHS R01 DE028864
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Spatial relationships between oropharyngeal structures and their coordinated dynamics ensure proper adaptations in functions such as respiration, chewing, and swallowing. Thus, the aim of this study is to analyze spatial changes in the normal oropharynx during respiration and mastication. For this purpose, eight 7-8 months old Yucatan minipigs, four of each sex were used. X-ray fluoroscopy was recorded with the field of view focused on the oropharyngeal region. The x-ray video clips showing respiratory cycles and masticatory sequences were digitized and traced. Points to be digitized and traced were located on the soft palate, epiglottis, tongue base, and pharyngeal wall. An X-Y coordinate system was established to trace distances and directions of each structure (structural), and between structures (inter-structural) during phases of respiration, chewing stages, and swallowing episodes. During respiration, the soft palate showed the largest X-Y movements with the largest distance change (1.32 ± 0.64 mm). In contrast, distance changes in the tongue base were significantly smaller (0.32 ± 0.21 mm, p < 0.05). Notably, during chewing the tongue base and epiglottis showed major changes in distance and direction. Similarly, during swallowing the tongue base showed the largest changes (2.94 ± 1.28 mm) followed by the pharyngeal wall and epiglottis. Thus, although coordinated, each pharyngeal structure plays specific roles. Understanding of these spatial and specific dynamics in different oropharyngeal structures would provide the baseline to analyze the potential mechanisms of various swallowing and breathing disorders such as dysphagia and obstructive sleep apnea.

Indexed as

DeglutitionMasticationOropharynxRespirationAnimalsFemaleFluoroscopyMaleSwineSwine, Miniaturechewingminiature swineoropharyngeal structuresrespirationswallowingX‐ray fluoroscopy

Identifiers

PMID39620318
PMCPMC13432064

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.