Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39620251›Full record

ArticleJournal of genetic counseling2025

Evaluation of face validity and core concepts of a novel knowledge scale for inherited heart disease: A pilot study.

Susan Christian, Tara Dzwiniel, Amy Baker, Barbara Biesecker, Kennedy Borle, Roya Mostafavi, Jill Slamon, Hannah Wand, Laura Yeates

Abstract readValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of genetic counseling, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Susan ChristianUniversity of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.ORCID 0000-0001-5248-3049
Tara DzwinielUniversity of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.
Amy BakerGenomics and Inherited Disease Program, Garvan Institute of Medical Research and University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia.
Barbara BieseckerNational Institute of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, USA.
Kennedy BorleInterdisciplinary Studies, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
Roya MostafaviLe Bonheur Children's Hospital, Memphis, Tennessee, USA.
Jill SlamonVanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, Tennessee, USA.
Hannah WandDepartment of Cardiology, Stanford Healthcare, Stanford, California, USA.
Laura YeatesGenomics and Inherited Disease Program, Garvan Institute of Medical Research and University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia.

Funding

National Society of Genetic Counselors Cardiovascular Special Interest Group
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The rising demand for genetic counseling has prompted the implementation of various innovative service delivery models, such as patient webinars, videos, chatbots, and the integration of genetic testing into mainstream healthcare. To ensure patients receive adequate information for informed decision-making, validated measures to assess these models are essential but currently limited in the setting of inherited heart disease. We aimed to develop and initiate validation of a cardiac knowledge scale, as part of the Multidimensional Model of Informed Choice measure, to assess whether patients (probands and family members) with inherited cardiomyopathies, arrhythmias, and aortopathies are provided with sufficient knowledge to make informed decisions about genetic testing. Content expert genetic counselors identified eight core concepts addressed during genetic counseling sessions; from these, eight true/false knowledge questions were created. Questions were reviewed by 22 international cardiac genetics counselors with additional changes made. Initial validation steps of the knowledge scale were conducted at two sites: the Edmonton Medical Genetic Clinic, University of Alberta Hospital in Edmonton, Canada, and the Genetic Heart Disease Clinic, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital in Sydney, Australia. Face validity was evaluated through nine patient interviews, resulting in minor revisions to four questions and major revisions to one question. An additional five patient interviews were conducted to evaluate the revised questions. The core concepts addressed in each question were further evaluated in the context of patient decision-making about genetic testing. All participants described the eight concepts as either helpful or essential in their decision-making process. The cardiac knowledge scale is a promising measure created to evaluate the informed choice of patients and their families affected by an inherited heart condition. The next step of validation includes trialing the cardiac knowledge scale with a real-world sample of patients deciding about genetic testing for inherited heart disease.

Indexed as

Genetic CounselingHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeHeart DiseasesFemaleGenetic TestingHumansMalePilot ProjectsSurveys and Questionnairescardiac genetic testinggenetic counselinginherited heart diseasepatient reported outcome measures

Identifiers

PMID39620251
PMCPMC11866733

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.