ArticleDigital health
Effect of telerehabilitation assessment for adults with musculoskeletal conditions on access to care beyond the COVID-19 pandemic: A retrospective case-control analysis.
Article in Digital health. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Short-Term Outcomes of a Structured Self-Rehabilitation Program After Mini-Open Latarjet Procedure in Military Personnel: A Prospective Observational Study.Medical sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Observational
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Musculoskeletal (MSK) conditions are the leading cause of disability worldwide. In MSK care, access to physical therapy is a major issue. The effectiveness of telerehabilitation phone assessment in improving access to care for MSK conditions has not yet been established in Saudi Arabia. Purpose: To compare the effect of using a telerehabilitation phone with face-to-face care initial assessment on access to care, number of sessions and goals achievement at discharge. Methods: This is a retrospective unmatched case-control analysis of a total of 724 Epic Results: The lead time in days was significantly lower for the phone group (3.82 ± 5.36) compared to the face-to-face group (15.65 ± 17.71) p < 0.0001. Longer lead times from referral to first appointment were less likely to be a phone appointment and more likely to be a face-to-face appointment p < 0.001. However, the time from the first to the second appointment was significantly longer for the phone group p<0.0001. There was no significant difference in the number of appointments between both groups. The majority of the patients in both groups achieved all therapy goals (over 80% for phone and over 75% for face-to-face). Conclusion: Initial telerehabilitation phone assessments compared to face-to-face care were associated with improved access to care, and there was no difference in the number of therapy sessions associated with achieving treatment goals. Future research is needed to determine the clinical effectiveness of phone initial assessments in the management of musculoskeletal conditions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.