ArticleJournal of tissue engineering
Meta-analysis of proteomics data from osteoblasts, bone, and blood: Insights into druggable targets, active factors, and potential biomarkers for bone biomaterial design.
Article in Journal of tissue engineering. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Y-RBCEVs accelerate fracture repair through osteogenesis and VCAN-mediated CD44/PI3K/AKT-dependent macrophage polarization.Bioactive materials · 2027Article
- Immunometabolism of macrophages in the bone microenvironment: a new perspective for bone healing therapy.Journal of advanced research · 2026Review
- Cardiolipin Remodeling as a Regulatory Switch in Osteogenesis: Insights from Multimodal Metabolic Imaging and Molecular Profiling.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
- Advanced therapeutic scaffolds of biomimetic periosteum for functional bone regeneration.Journal of nanobiotechnology · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Non-healing bone defects are a pressing public health concern accounting for one main cause for decreased life expectancy and quality. An aging population accompanied with increasing incidence of comorbidities, foreshadows a worsening of this socio-economic problem. Conventional treatments for non-healing bone defects prove ineffective for 5%-10% of fractures. Those challenges not only increase the patient's burden but also complicate medical intervention, underscoring the need for more effective treatment strategies and identification of patients at risk before treatment selection. To address this, our proteomic meta-analysis aims to identify universally affected proteins and functions in the context of bone regeneration that can be utilized as novel bioactive biomaterial functionalizations, drug targets or therapeutics as well as analytical endpoints, or biomarkers in implant design and testing, respectively. We compiled 29 proteomic studies covering cellular models, extracellular vesicles, extracellular matrix, bone tissue, and liquid-biopsies to address different tissue hierarchies and species. An innovative, integrated framework consisting of data harmonization, candidate protein selection, network construction, and functional enrichment as well as drug repurposing and protein scoring metrics was developed. To make this framework widely applicable to other research questions, we have published a detailed tutorial of our meta-analysis process. We identified 51 proteins that are potentially important for bone healing. This includes well-known ECM components such as collagens, fibronectin and periostin, and proteins less explored in bone biology like YWHAE, HSPG2, CCN1, HTRA1, IGFBP7, LGALS1, TGFBI, C3, SERPINA1, and ANXA1 that might be utilized in future bone biomaterial development. Furthermore, we discovered the compounds trifluoperazine, phenethyl isothiocyanate, quercetin, and artenimol, which target key proteins such as S100A4, YWHAZ, MMP2, and TPM4 providing the option to manipulate undesired processes in bone regeneration. This may open new ways for treatment options to face the increasing socio-economic pressure of non-healing bone defects.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.