Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39620085›Full record

ArticleMarine life science & technology2024

Deep learning-based fishing ground prediction with multiple environmental factors.

Mingyang Xie, Bin Liu, Xinjun Chen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Marine life science & technology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Mingyang XieCollege of Marine Sciences, Shanghai Ocean University, Shanghai, 201306 China.
Bin LiuCollege of Marine Sciences, Shanghai Ocean University, Shanghai, 201306 China.
Xinjun ChenCollege of Marine Sciences, Shanghai Ocean University, Shanghai, 201306 China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Improving the accuracy of fishing ground prediction for oceanic economic species has always been one of the most concerning issues in fisheries research. Recent studies have confirmed that deep learning has achieved superior results over traditional methods in the era of big data. However, the deep learning-based fishing ground prediction model with a single environment suffers from the problem that the area of the fishing ground is too large and not concentrated. In this study, we developed a deep learning-based fishing ground prediction model with multiple environmental factors using neon flying squid (

Indexed as

Center fishing groundDeep learningMultiple environmental factorsOmmastrephes bartramiiTemporal scalesU-Net

Identifiers

PMID39620085
PMCPMC11602920

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.