Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39619790›Full record

ArticleEcology and evolution2024

On the Relationship Between the Gini Coefficient and Skewness.

Meng Lian, Long Chen, Cang Hui, Fuyuan Zhu, Peijian Shi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Ecology and evolution, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. PCR bias impacts microbiome ecological analyses.PLoS computational biology · 2026
    Article
  6. PCR Bias Impacts Microbiome Ecological Analyses.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Meng LianCo-Innovation Centre for Sustainable Forestry in Southern China, State Key Laboratory of Tree Genetics and Breeding, Bamboo Research Institute, College of Life Sciences Nanjing Forestry University Nanjing China.
Long ChenCo-Innovation Centre for Sustainable Forestry in Southern China, State Key Laboratory of Tree Genetics and Breeding, Bamboo Research Institute, College of Life Sciences Nanjing Forestry University Nanjing China.
Cang HuiDepartment of Mathematical Sciences, Centre for Invasion Biology Stellenbosch University Stellenbosch South Africa.
Fuyuan ZhuCo-Innovation Centre for Sustainable Forestry in Southern China, State Key Laboratory of Tree Genetics and Breeding, Bamboo Research Institute, College of Life Sciences Nanjing Forestry University Nanjing China.
Peijian ShiCo-Innovation Centre for Sustainable Forestry in Southern China, State Key Laboratory of Tree Genetics and Breeding, Bamboo Research Institute, College of Life Sciences Nanjing Forestry University Nanjing China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4696-0130

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Skewness, a measure of the asymmetry of a distribution, is frequently employed to reflect a biologically important property. Another statistic, the Gini coefficient (GC), originally used to measure economic inequality, has been validated in measuring the inequality of biological size distributions. Given that the GC and skewness control overlapping domains and interact with each other, researchers are perplexed by their relationship (varying with the biological [organ, tissue or cell] size distributions) and use both of them together to provide a more complete picture of the data. This study provides analytical forms of the GC for biological size distributions, including two-parameter Weibull, uniform, normal, two-parameter lognormal, gamma, three-parameter Weibull, three-parameter lognormal, and three-parameter gamma distributions. Two empirical data sets and simulation data sets were used to clarify the GC-skewness relationships under different distributions. For the aforementioned distributions, the GC-skewness relationships can be divided into three types: (i) for a symmetrical distribution, the skewness is 0, and the GC ranges from 0.56 to 0.58 multiplied by the standard deviation divided by the mean irrespective of its relationship with the skewness; (ii) for an asymmetric distribution with a zero threshold, the GC is a monotonously increasing function of the skewness, and the two measures are equivalent; (iii) for an asymmetric distribution with a non-zero threshold, the GC is determined by the skewness and an additional correction factor. We showed the differences in improving the accuracy of GC calculations based on small-sample adjustments among various calculation methods, including the polygon (trapezoidal set) area method and the rotated Lorenz curve method. The present study turns the GC into a property of the distribution and offers a clear understanding for the GC-skewness relationship. This work provides insights into selecting and using the GC to measure inequality in ecological data, facilitating more accurate and meaningful analyses.

Indexed as

adjusted Gini coefficientdiameter at breast heightskewnessWeibull distribution

Identifiers

PMID39619790
PMCPMC11604574

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.