ArticleCaspian journal of internal medicine2025
De-escalation of anti-CD20 monoclonal antibodies to low-moderate efficacy disease-modifying treatments (DMTs) in patients with relapse-remitting multiple sclerosis: An initial Iranian experience.
Article in Caspian journal of internal medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Safety and efficacy of extended versus standard interval dosing of anti-CD20 therapy in multiple sclerosis - A meta-analysis.Multiple sclerosis journal - experimental, translational and clinicalArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Anti-CD20 are among the high-efficacy DMTs commonly used in treating multiple sclerosis (MS). Long-term safety data on anti-CD20s are limited. There is convincing evidence of hypogammaglobulinemia in the long-term use of anti-CD20s, raising the likelihood of infection. Accordingly, there is an unmet need for de-escalation therapy in stable patients to reduce adverse events. Herein we aimed to describe our experience with ten relapse-remitting MS (RRMS) patients who were switched from anti-CD20s to the low-moderate efficacy DMTs. Methods: This cohort study was conducted between January 2020 and February 2023 at the MS Research Center of Sina Hospital, Tehran, Iran, to identify the characteristics of RRMS patients who were switched from anti-CD20s to low-moderate efficacy DMTs within 12 months of the last anti-CD20 infusion. Patients were then followed up to 18 months after de-escalation. Results: All patients were females, with a mean age of 39.3±2.53-year-old and a mean disease duration of 9.7±1.39 years. After a mean of 2.95±0.44 years of treatment with anti-CD20s, patients were de-escalated to INF-β1a (n=5), dimethyl fumarate (DMF) (n=3), fingolimod (n=1), and teriflunomide (n=1). The main reason for anti-CD20 discontinuation was an infectious concern. Within 18 months of follow-up, no patient developed clinical or MRI activity. Additionally, we did not find evidence of disability progression in any patients (P=0.13). Conclusion: The present study is a real-world experience of de-escalating anti-CD20s to low-moderate efficacy DMTs, which suggests that at short-term follow-up, de-escalating anti-CD20s appeared to be effective and safe in RRMS patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.