Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39619730›Full record

ReviewInfection and drug resistance2024

CRISPR-Cas Systems in the Fight Against Antimicrobial Resistance: Current Status, Potentials, and Future Directions.

Mohamed Mustaf Ahmed, Hassan Hakeem Kayode, Olalekan John Okesanya, Bonaventure Michael Ukoaka, Gilbert Eshun, Marina Ramzy Mourid, Olaniyi Abideen Adigun, Jerico Bautista Ogaya, Zeinab Omar Mohamed, Don Eliseo Lucero-Prisno

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Infection and drug resistance, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 36 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
36citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

36 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Advances in CRISPR-Cas for Diagnosis and Treatment ofPathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Nanocarrier-mediated CRISPR-Cas delivery: a novel approach against antibiotic-resistant superbugs.Saudi pharmaceutical journal : SPJ : the official publication of the Saudi Pharmaceutical Society · 2026
    Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Mohamed Mustaf AhmedFaculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, SIMAD University, Mogadishu, Somalia.ORCID 0009-0006-5991-4052
Hassan Hakeem KayodeDepartment of Medical Laboratory Science, Oyo State Hospital Management Board, Oyo, Nigeria.ORCID 0000-0002-8508-3006
Olalekan John OkesanyaFaculty of Medicine, Department of Public Health and Maritime Transport, University of Thessaly, Volos, Greece.ORCID 0000-0002-3809-4271
Bonaventure Michael UkoakaCommunity and Clinical Research Division, First on-Call Initiative, Port Harcourt, Nigeria.ORCID 0009-0000-9367-2612
Gilbert EshunDepartment of Medicine, Seventh Day Adventist Hospital, Asamang, Ghana.ORCID 0000-0002-9836-0834
Marina Ramzy MouridFaculty of Medicine, Alexandria University, Alexandria, Egypt.ORCID 0000-0001-7821-500X
Olaniyi Abideen AdigunDepartment of Medical Laboratory Science, Nigerian Defence Academy, Kaduna, Kaduna State, Nigeria.ORCID 0000-0002-2375-6375
Jerico Bautista OgayaDepartment of Medical Technology, Institute of Health Sciences and Nursing, Far Eastern University, Manila, Philippines.ORCID 0009-0005-3595-8643
Zeinab Omar MohamedFaculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, SIMAD University, Mogadishu, Somalia.ORCID 0009-0000-3637-3755
Don Eliseo Lucero-PrisnoDepartment of Global Health and Development, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-2179-6365

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Antimicrobial resistance (AMR) is a critical global health concern that threatens the efficacy of existing antibiotics and poses significant challenges to public health and the economy worldwide. This review explores the potential of CRISPR-Cas systems as a novel approach to combating AMR and examines current applications, limitations, and prospects. Methods: A comprehensive literature search was conducted across multiple databases, including PubMed, Google Scholar, Scopus, and Web of Science, covering publications published from 2014 to August 2024. This review focuses on CRISPR-Cas technologies and their applications in AMR. Results: CRISPR-Cas systems have demonstrated efficacy in combating antimicrobial resistance by targeting and eliminating antibiotic-resistance genes. For example, studies have shown that CRISPR-Cas9 can effectively target and eliminate colistin resistance genes in MCR-1 plasmids, restoring susceptibility to carbapenems in bacteria such as Conclusion: CRISPR-Cas systems are promising for fighting AMR by targeting and eliminating antibiotic-resistant genes, as demonstrated by the effective targeting of colistin resistance genes on MCR-1 plasmids and their similar activities. However, the effectiveness of CRISPR-Cas is affected by variations in the CRISPR loci among bacterial species. Challenges persist, such as optimizing delivery methods and addressing off-target effects to ensure the safety and precision of CRISPR-Cas systems in clinical settings.

Indexed as

antimicrobial resistancebacteriophage deliveryCRISPR-Cas systemsgene editing

Identifiers

PMID39619730
PMCPMC11608035

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.