ArticleWorld journal of pediatric surgery2024
Postoperative rectal irrigation after laparoscopic Swenson pull-through: is early instrumentation safe?
Article in World journal of pediatric surgery, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: In approaching surgical correction of Hirschsprung disease (HSCR), laparoscopic Swenson endorectal pull-through (Lap-S-ERPT) requires less transanal dissection and sphincter stretch. This may lead to more immediate postoperative obstructive symptoms. While antibiotics and rectal irrigations are mainstays of treatment, there is concern about rectal instrumentation in the setting of recent low anal anastomosis. The purpose of this study was to assess the incidence and safety of early rectal irrigations following Lap-S-ERPT. Methods: This is a single-center, retrospective review of all pediatric patients who underwent Lap-S-ERPT for HSCR from January 2018 to October 2023. Irrigations were performed if patients had obstructive symptoms including emesis, obstipation, and dilated colonic loops on radiographs. The primary outcome was need for postoperative rectal irrigation. Secondary outcomes included time from surgery to irrigation, duration of irrigation, and incidence of anastomotic leak. Results: A total of 37 patients (62% male) underwent a Lap-S-ERPT at a median age of 3 months (interquartile range (IQR): 0.5, 5.0). Rectosigmoid disease was the most common diagnosis ( Conclusion: Following Lap-S-ERPT, nearly 30% of patients underwent rectal irrigation for postoperative obstructive symptoms. Despite concerns about instrumentation with a recent low anastomosis, there was no increase in leak rate in patients who received rectal irrigations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.