Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39619700›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in transplantation2024

A review of cell-free DNA and epigenetics for non-invasive diagnosis in solid organ transplantation.

Alizée Sebastian, Monique Silvy, Benjamin Coiffard, Martine Reynaud-Gaubert, Frédérique Magdinier, Jacques Chiaroni, Christophe Picard, Pascal Pedini

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in transplantation, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. %dd-cfDNA: The New Frontier for Heart/Lung Transplant Surveillance?Transplant international : official journal of the European Society for Organ Transplantation · 2025
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Alizée SebastianAix-Marseille University, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS), Etablissement Français du Sang (EFS), Anthropologie Bio-Culturelle, Droit, Éthique et Santé (ADES), Marseille, France.
Monique SilvyBeDia Genomics, Aix-en-Provence, France.
Benjamin CoiffardDepartment of Respiratory Medicine and Lung Transplantation, Aix-Marseille University, APHM, Hôpital Nord, Marseille, France.
Martine Reynaud-GaubertDepartment of Respiratory Medicine and Lung Transplantation, Aix-Marseille University, APHM, Hôpital Nord, Marseille, France.
Frédérique MagdinierAix-Marseille University, Institut National de la Santé Et de la Recherche Médicale (INSERM), Marseille Medical Genetics (MMG), Marseille Medical Genetics, Marseille, France.
Jacques ChiaroniAix-Marseille University, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS), Etablissement Français du Sang (EFS), Anthropologie Bio-Culturelle, Droit, Éthique et Santé (ADES), Marseille, France.
Christophe PicardAix-Marseille University, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS), Etablissement Français du Sang (EFS), Anthropologie Bio-Culturelle, Droit, Éthique et Santé (ADES), Marseille, France.
Pascal PediniAix-Marseille University, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS), Etablissement Français du Sang (EFS), Anthropologie Bio-Culturelle, Droit, Éthique et Santé (ADES), Marseille, France.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Circulating cell-free DNA (cfDNA) is emerging as a non-invasive biomarker in solid organ transplantation (SOT) monitoring and data on its diagnostic potential have been increasing in recent years. This review aims to summarize the main advances in technologies, clinical applications and future perspectives of cfDNA for transplantation, and to approach the contribution of epigenetics to improve the specific detection of rejection. Methods: Published literature investigating cfDNA as a biomarker for the diagnosis of transplant rejection was systematically reviewed, specifically clinical trials evaluating the test performance of algorithms predicting rejection based on cfDNA fraction. Literature highlighting epigenetic features in transplant rejection was also reviewed to outline the potential contribution of the epigenomic analysis to the needs of rejection-specific diagnosis. Results: 40 articles were reviewed, and results were extracted and summarized. 16 met the inclusion criteria by evaluating the diagnostic performance of a predictive test for the discrimination of rejection vs. non-rejection patients (2 heart, 3 liver, 4 kidney, and 7 lung transplantations). The recurring conclusion is the kinetics of dd-cfDNA levels, strongly increasing immediately after transplantation and reaching basal levels after days to weeks and remaining stable in non-rejection patients. On the other hand, rejection is characterized by an increase in dd-cfDNA levels, depending on the transplanted organs. In addition, the epigenetic signature can help improve the specificity of the diagnosis of rejection by searching for specific epigenetic features that are by the clinical status of patients. Conclusion: Cell-free DNA is a promising non-invasive biomarker but still needs standardization of technologies and protocols to be used for diagnostic purposes. Moreover, the lack of specificity of this marker can be compensated by the contribution of epigenetic analysis for which data are growing, although progress is still needed for its use in a clinical context.

Indexed as

biomarkercfDNAdiagnosisepigeneticmethylationtransplantation

Identifiers

PMID39619700
PMCPMC11605403

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.