ArticleMaterials today. Bio2024
Extracellular vesicles from human adipose-derived stem cell spheroids: Characterization and therapeutic implications in diabetic wound healing.
Article in Materials today. Bio, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Immunometabolic reprogramming of macrophages by miR-423-5p-enriched small extracellular vesicles delivered via glucose/ROS-responsive hydrogel for diabetic wound healing.Journal of nanobiotechnology · 2026Article
- Extracellular Vesicle Therapies for Diabetic Skin Lesions: Mechanisms, Engineering, and Clinical Translation.International journal of nanomedicine · 2026Review
- MicroRNA-Enriched Plant-Derived Exosomes Alleviate Colitis by Modulating Systemic Immunity, Metabolic Homeostasis, and Gut Microbiota.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2025Article
- Physically engineered extracellular vesicles targeted delivering miR-21-5p to promote renoprotection after renal ischemia-reperfusion injury.Materials today. Bio · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The management of diabetic wounds presents a considerable challenge within the realm of clinical practice. Cellular-derived nanoparticles, or extracellular vesicles (EV), generated by human adipose-derived stem cells (hASCs) have been investigated as promising candidates for the treatment of diabetic wounds. Nevertheless, limitations on the yield, as well as the qualitative angiogenic properties of the EV produced, have been a persistent issue. In this study, a novel approach involving the use of various cell culture morphologies, such as cell spheroids, on hASC was used to promote both EV yield and qualitative angiogenic properties for clinical use, with an emphasis on the in vivo angiogenic properties exhibited by the EV. Moreover, an increase in the secretion of the EV was confirmed after cell spheroid culture. Furthermore, microRNA(miRNA) analysis of the produced EVs indicated an increase in the presence of wound healing-associated miRNAs on the cell spheroid EV. Analysis of the effectiveness of the treated EVs in vitro indicated a significant promotion of the biological function of fibroblast and endothelial cells, cell migration, and cell proliferation post-cell spheroid EV application. Meanwhile, in vivo experiments on diabetic rats indicated a significant increase in collagen production, re-epithelization, and angiogenesis of the diabetic wound after EV administration. In this investigation, we posit that the use of cell spheroids for the culture of hASC represents a novel approach to enhance the substantial secretion of extracellular vesicles while increasing the angiogenic wound healing properties. This innovation holds promise for augmenting the therapeutic potential of EVs in diabetic wound healing, aligning with the exigencies of clinical applications for these nanoparticles.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.