Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39619630›Full record

ArticleHRB open research2024

General practitioners' and women's experiences of perimenopause consultations: A qualitative evidence synthesis protocol.

Laura-Jane McCarthy, Aoife O'Mahony, Aisling Jennings, Sheena M McHugh

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in HRB open research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Laura-Jane McCarthySchool of Public Health, University College Cork, Cork, T12 XF62, Ireland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0008-4539-0555
Aoife O'MahonySchool of Public Health, University College Cork, Cork, T12 XF62, Ireland.
Aisling JenningsDepartment of General Practice, University College Cork, Cork, T12 XF62, Ireland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9246-3955
Sheena M McHughSchool of Public Health, University College Cork, Cork, T12 XF62, Ireland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6595-0491

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Perimenopause precedes menopause and can cause a myriad of symptoms for women. General practitioners (GPs) are frequently the first contact for perimenopausal women with symptoms. However, women express feeling dissatisfied with the consultations they have with their GPs for perimenopausal symptoms. Moreover, diagnostic difficulties can make these consultations challenging for GPs. Despite these challenges, research to date has focused on menopause, not the transition to menopause. To date, no evidence synthesis has examined how women experience perimenopause consultations, nor how GPs experience providing care to these women. Objective: To systematically search, collate, and appraise the qualitative literature to understand general practitioners' and women's experiences of perimenopause consultations and examine how treatment decisions are made during consultations. Methods: A meta-ethnography will be conducted following Sattar Discussion: Findings will provide new and useful insight into how GPs and women experience consultations for perimenopause and how decisions are made during these consultations.

Indexed as

general practicegeneral practitionersmeta-ethnographyperimenopauseQualitative Evidence Synthesiswomen

Identifiers

PMID39619630
PMCPMC11605171

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.