Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39619597›Full record

ReviewHeliyon2024

An insight into advanced glass systems for radiation shielding applications: A review on different modifiers and heavy metal oxides-based glasses.

M S Al-Buriahi, Recep Kurtulus, Canel Eke, Sultan Alomairy, I O Olarinoye

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Heliyon, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

M S Al-BuriahiDepartment of Physics, Sakarya University, Sakarya, Turkey.
Recep KurtulusFaculty of Engineering, Department of Materials Science and Engineering, Afyon Kocatepe University, Afyonkarahisar, Turkey.
Canel EkeAkdeniz University, Faculty of Education, Department of Mathematics and Science Education, 07058, Antalya, Turkey.
Sultan AlomairyDepartment of Physics, College of Science, Taif University, Taif, 21944, Saudi Arabia.
I O OlarinoyeDepartment of Physics, School of Physical Sciences, Federal University of Technology, Minna, Nigeria.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Ionizing radiation from natural and many synthetic sources is a remarkable tool in many scientific, production, quality control, food preservation, medical, security, and other technological processes. The need to protect humans (public and personnel), gadgets, the environment, and animals from the harmful effects of radiation, while maintaining and expanding the scope of application has made radiation protection an important topic to discuss. Among the methods and materials available for radiation control, shielding and the use of glass shields are the most effective and attractive methods and materials, respectively. In this report, the basic parameters for measuring shielding competences, basic shielding materials and their shortcomings, and glass shields are discussed. Five categories of glasses, namely, borate, germanate, silicate, phosphate, and tellurites, with important shielding attributes, are reviewed. The role of chemical composition, density, and mean atomic number as gamma shielding delineating factors was emphasized. The weaknesses and comparable advantages of each glass system were presented as well. The review concludes by looking at the trend and future of glass shields and research in radiation technology. The data and analysis presented in this review provides scientists and radiation protection technologist on the impact of certain chemical oxides on shielding efficacies of different glass systems.

Indexed as

Glass systemsModifying oxidesRadiationShielding applicationsWaste glasses

Identifiers

PMID39619597
PMCPMC11605414

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.