ArticleHeliyon2024
Potential of cattle urine as an alternative fertilizer for maize (
Article in Heliyon, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Organic formulation modulating crop health, yield and managing anthracnose-twister and Stemphylium blight of onion.Frontiers in plant science · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Maize productivity has been increasing through the years due to increased use of inorganic fertilizers. However, the price and environmental impact has brought lack of interest among the farmers. Thus, this study was aimed at evaluating the growth, yield and nitrogen use efficiency (NUE) of maize varieties under cattle urine application. The field experiment was conducted in randomized complete block design with three replications. The experiment consisted of four treatments viz. Control, 100 and 50 % cattle urine and recommended dose of inorganic fertilizer. The results demonstrated a comparable growth and grain yield increment due to 100 % cattle urine and recommended dose of inorganic fertilizer. The difference between the two varieties in growth, yield and related traits, and NUE indices due to fertilizer applications was non-significant. The leaf area of maize nourished with 100, 50 % cattle urine and recommended dose of inorganic fertilizer increased by 11.15, 9.73 and 9.78 folds, respectively, in two months period relative to the controls. Fertilized plants had significantly (p < 0.05) higher grain yield (GY). The use of 100, 50 % cattle urine and inorganic fertilizers resulted in 526.76, 326.12, 542.91 % and 47.83, 36.03, 49.78 % increment in average GY and aboveground biomass, respectively, compared to controls. Similarly, plants fertilized with 50 % cattle urine showed an average GY reduction of 39.87 and 38.10 % compared to the recommended dose of inorganic fertilizer and 100 % cattle urine, respectively. The use of 50 % cattle urine produced significantly higher NUE, N agronomic efficiency (NAE), N recovery efficiency (NRE) and internal efficiency (IE). Higher GY kg
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.