ArticleACS omega2024
Engineered Recombinant Hagfish Intermediate Filament Proteins: Unraveling Domain Roles in Synthetic Fiber Formation and Mechanics.
Article in ACS omega, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Hagfish intermediate filament (HIF) proteins, consisting of α and γ subunits, have been previously recombinantly expressed, purified, and utilized to form dry fibers with impressive mechanical properties. HIFα and HIFγ consist of three protein domains (N-termini, C-termini, and central rod domain). To begin to understand the structure-function relationship between the protein domains in fiber formation and properties in a synthetic fiber spinning system, we designed recombinant protein constructs with varying combinations of the N-terminus, central rod domain (CRD), and C-terminus for both the α and γ proteins. The constructs, for both α and γ, were expressed, purified, and spun into dry fibers, which were then tested and analyzed for mechanical and structural properties. Mechanical testing revealed that the α constructs had the highest tensile strength when both termini were removed while including either terminus improved strain and toughness compared to α CRD constructs. The γ constructs displayed improved tensile strength and elastic modulus when only the N-terminus was present. Mixing the α and γ constructs generally enhanced the mechanical properties compared to the full-length rHIFα and rHIFγ. Fourier transform infrared-attenuated total reflection (FTIR-ATR) analysis indicated that the CRD contributes more to the β-sheet content in the stretched fibers, while the termini contribute more to the α-helical/random coil regions. These findings provide valuable insights into the roles of the different protein domains in the assembly and mechanical performance of rHIF and other recombinantly expressed IF. By understanding these structure-function relationships, functionally tailored recombinant IF proteins can be designed for specific applications in biomaterials developments.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.