Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39619485›Full record

ArticleOpen access emergency medicine : OAEM2024

Epidemiological Trends and Characteristics of Dermatological Conditions Presenting to a Saudi Major Emergency Department.

Nouf F Bin Rubaian, Reem S AlOmar, Ahmed S Alzahrani, Faleh M Alotaibi, Mohammed A Alharbi, Bader S Alanazi, Serene R Almuhaidib, Nawaf F Alsaadoon, Dunya Alfaraj, Nouf A AlShamlan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Open access emergency medicine : OAEM, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Nouf F Bin RubaianDermatology Department, King Fahad Hospital of the University, Imam Abdulrahman Bin Faisal University, Dammam, Saudi Arabia.
Reem S AlOmarDepartment of Family and Community Medicine, College of Medicine, Imam Abdulrahman Bin Faisal University, Dammam, Saudi Arabia.ORCID 0000-0003-4899-7965
Ahmed S AlzahraniCollege of Medicine, Imam Abdulrahman Bin Faisal University, Dammam, Saudi Arabia.
Faleh M AlotaibiCollege of Medicine, Imam Abdulrahman Bin Faisal University, Dammam, Saudi Arabia.
Mohammed A AlharbiCollege of Medicine, Imam Abdulrahman Bin Faisal University, Dammam, Saudi Arabia.ORCID 0009-0001-2460-1607
Bader S AlanaziCollege of Medicine, Imam Abdulrahman Bin Faisal University, Dammam, Saudi Arabia.
Serene R AlmuhaidibDepartment of Dermatology, Dammam Medical Complex, Dammam, Saudi Arabia.
Nawaf F AlsaadoonDepartment of Emergency, King Fahad University Hospital, Al-Khobar, Saudi Arabia.
Dunya AlfarajEmergency Department, King Fahad Hospital of the University, Imam Abdulrahman Bin Faisal University, Dammam, Saudi Arabia.ORCID 0000-0002-7798-1885
Nouf A AlShamlanDepartment of Family and Community Medicine, College of Medicine, Imam Abdulrahman Bin Faisal University, Dammam, Saudi Arabia.ORCID 0000-0002-8049-237X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Numerous dermatological conditions present in the emergency department (ED). Some have subtle presentations, yet most provoke patient suffering. Such conditions need to be identified and managed properly. This study aims to epidemiologically describe the patterns and characteristics of dermatological conditions presenting to a secondary teaching hospital's ED. Methods: This retrospective chart review study analyses data on dermatological conditions that have presented to the ED between January 2021 and May 2023. The data gathered included sociodemographic variables, date and shift of visit, triage level, dermatological complaint characteristics, management, and discharge status. Comparative analysis was performed, and the level of significance was set at 0.05. Results: The total number of cases was 301. The median age was 12 years (IQR = 4-30 years), with similar distribution between males and females (50.17% and 49.83% respectively). Most cases had presented to the ED during the morning shift (49.83%). Triage levels IV and V made up 94.69%, and only 5.32% belonged to triage level III. Most presented during the winter season (32.89%). The median visit duration was 312 minutes, and of all cases treated, only 10 required a return visit to the ED. Also, 41.53% were discharged and 58.47% required further management. Maculopapular rashes were the most common finding (35.55%). Bullae/blisters and erythroderma accounted for those that most often required further management. The two most prescribed medications were topical steroids and antihistamines, followed by emollients (32.09% and 15.81%, respectively). Viral infections were the most reported complaint (22.26%) and only two patients complained of erythema multiforme (0.66%). Conclusion: This study found that the majority of cases could have been managed by family physicians at a primary care setting. Also, epidemiological seasonal variations were observed where the majority of patients requiring further management had presented during the autumn season.

Indexed as

dermatologyemergency departmentepidemiology

Identifiers

PMID39619485
PMCPMC11607991

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.